• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新大陆臭虫与一种蚂蚁物种之间的新型营养共生关系:对宿主植物潜在益处的深入了解。

A novel trophobiotic interaction between a Neotropical stink bug and an ant species: Insights into potential benefits to the host plant.

机构信息

Núcleo de Extensão e Pesquisa em Ecologia e Evolução (NEPEE), Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil; Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2021 Jan;182:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104296. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104296
PMID:33338575
Abstract

Trophobiotic interactions occur when phytophagous insects provide a sugary liquid, the honeydew, for ants and obtain defence against predators or parasitoids. The plants may indirectly benefit from an increased ant foraging activity by reducing the herbivorous abundance. These three trophic interactions have been previously studied for several species, but mainly involving plants with extrafloral nectaries, which is a plant structure that also produce attractive substances for ants. Previous studies have reported an ant preference for honeydew over extrafloral nectary content. Therefore, trophobiosis can be an important mediator of ant-plant interactions. In this study, we describe a trophobiotic interaction between Edessa contermina stink bugs and Camponotus blandus ants on the Byrsonima verbascifolia plants occurring in a conservation area of Brazilian savanna. Stink bugs excreted a sugary liquid which was consumed by the ants, and C. blandus ants were observed consuming potential parasitoids. Stink bugs were more abundant in plants containing high food supply and shelter availability. The occurrence of ants depended of the number of inflorescences and trunk circumference of B. verbascifolia. Ant abundance, however, was positively correlated with stink bug abundance and the number of inflorescences. Herbivory was not explained by neither plant architecture nor ant abundance. This high ant activity may benefit plants from a protection against herbivory, but we did not detect this effect during the study period. Hence, the interaction among ants and plants was apparently commensal. We concluded that plant traits were important in ant attraction, but stink bugs foraging also increased ant activity on the plant, but mainly on inflorescences. Therefore, the plant may benefit from an increased defence of inflorescences rather than leaves.

摘要

植食性昆虫为蚂蚁提供含糖液体——蜜露,以获得防御捕食者或寄生蜂的能力,从而产生营养共生关系。植物可以通过减少食草动物的数量而间接受益于蚂蚁觅食活动的增加。这三种营养共生关系已经在几种物种中进行了研究,但主要涉及具有额外花蜜的植物,这些植物也会产生对蚂蚁有吸引力的物质。先前的研究报告称,蚂蚁更喜欢蜜露而不是额外花蜜。因此,营养共生可以成为蚂蚁与植物相互作用的重要媒介。在这项研究中,我们描述了巴西热带稀树草原保护区的 Byrsonima verbascifolia 植物上的 Edessa contermina 臭虫和 Camponotus blandus 蚂蚁之间的营养共生关系。臭虫排泄出一种含糖液体,被蚂蚁消耗,并且观察到 C. blandus 蚂蚁消耗潜在的寄生蜂。臭虫在含有高食物供应和遮蔽物的植物中更为丰富。蚂蚁的出现取决于 B. verbascifolia 的花序数量和树干周长。然而,蚂蚁的丰度与臭虫的丰度和花序数量呈正相关。植物结构或蚂蚁丰度都不能解释食草性。尽管蚂蚁活动水平较高,但在研究期间并未发现对植物免受食草性侵害有益的效果。因此,蚂蚁和植物之间的相互作用显然是共生的。我们得出的结论是,植物特征对于蚂蚁的吸引力很重要,但臭虫的觅食也会增加蚂蚁在植物上的活动,尤其是在花序上。因此,植物可能受益于增加对花序的防御,而不是对叶子的防御。

相似文献

1
A novel trophobiotic interaction between a Neotropical stink bug and an ant species: Insights into potential benefits to the host plant.一种新大陆臭虫与一种蚂蚁物种之间的新型营养共生关系:对宿主植物潜在益处的深入了解。
Behav Processes. 2021 Jan;182:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104296. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
Ant-caterpillar antagonism at the community level: interhabitat variation of tritrophic interactions in a neotropical savanna.群落水平上蚂蚁与毛虫的对抗:新热带稀树草原中三级营养相互作用的栖息地间差异
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):442-52. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12286. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
3
Field biology of Edessa rufomarginata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): phenology, behavior, and patterns of host plant use.红缘伊缘蝽(半翅目:蝽科)的野外生物学:物候学、行为及寄主植物利用模式
Environ Entomol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1903-10. doi: 10.1603/EN10129.
4
Indirect effects of mutualism: ant-treehopper associations deter pollinators and reduce reproduction in a tropical shrub.互利共生的间接影响:蚂蚁与角蝉的共生关系会驱赶传粉者并降低一种热带灌木的繁殖率。
Oecologia. 2018 Mar;186(3):691-701. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4045-7. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Variation in Extrafloral Nectary Productivity Influences the Ant Foraging.花外蜜腺生产力的变化影响蚂蚁觅食。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169492. eCollection 2017.
6
Influence of neighboring plants on the dynamics of an ant-acacia protection mutualism.邻近植物对蚂蚁-金合欢保护共生关系动态的影响。
Ecology. 2017 Dec;98(12):3034-3043. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2008.
7
Variation in the outcomes of an ant-plant system: fire and leaf fungus infection reduce benefits to plants with extrafloral nectaries.蚁-植物系统结果的变化:火灾和叶部真菌感染会减少具花外蜜腺植物的益处。
J Insect Sci. 2014;14:84. doi: 10.1093/jis/14.1.84.
8
Temporal Variation in the Abundance and Richness of Foliage-Dwelling Ants Mediated by Extrafloral Nectar.由花外蜜介导的叶栖蚂蚁丰富度和物种丰富度的时间变化。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0158283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158283. eCollection 2016.
9
Non-additive benefit or cost? Disentangling the indirect effects that occur when plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and honeydew-producing insects share exotic ant mutualists.非加性收益或成本?当带有额外花蜜和蜜露产生昆虫的植物与外来蚂蚁共生时,解开间接效应的谜团。
Ann Bot. 2013 Jun;111(6):1295-307. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct082. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
10
Ant-plant-herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna.新热带稀树草原中蚂蚁-植物-食草动物的相互作用。
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Dec;91(12):557-70. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0585-x. Epub 2004 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Two sexes respond equally to food restriction in a sexually dimorphic but not body mass dimorphic jumping spider.在一种具有两性异形但非体重异形的跳蛛中,两种性别对食物限制的反应相同。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 21;11(20):14033-14041. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8112. eCollection 2021 Oct.