Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):863-870. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01570-3. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
Measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) is an essential part of clinical management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, clinical utility and impact on clinical outcome of ICP monitoring remain controversial. Follow-up imaging using cranial computed tomography (CCT) is commonly performed in these patients. This retrospective cohort study reports on complication rates of ICP measurement in severe TBI patients, as well as on findings and clinical consequences of follow-up CCT.
We performed a retrospective clinical chart review of severe TBI patients with invasive ICP measurement treated at an urban level I trauma center between January 2007 and September 2017.
Clinical records of 213 patients were analyzed. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission was 6 with an intra-hospital mortality of 20.7%. Overall, complications in 12 patients (5.6%) related to the invasive ICP-measurement were recorded of which 5 necessitated surgical intervention. Follow-up CCT scans were performed in 192 patients (89.7%). Indications for follow-up CCTs included routine imaging without clinical deterioration (n = 137, 64.3%), and increased ICP values and/or clinical deterioration (n = 55, 25.8%). Follow-up imaging based on clinical deterioration and increased ICP values were associated with significantly increased likelihoods of worsening of CCT findings compared to routinely performed CCT scans with an odds ratio of 5.524 (95% CI 1.625-18.773) and 6.977 (95% CI 3.262-14.926), respectively. Readings of follow-up CCT imaging resulted in subsequent surgical intervention in six patients (3.1%).
Invasive ICP-monitoring in severe TBI patients was safe in our study population with an acceptable complication rate. We found a high number of follow-up CCT. Our results indicate that CCT imaging in patients with invasive ICP monitoring should only be considered in patients with elevated ICP values and/or clinical deterioration.
颅内压(ICP)测量是严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)临床管理的重要组成部分。然而,ICP 监测的临床实用性及其对临床结果的影响仍存在争议。这些患者通常会进行后续的头颅计算机断层扫描(CCT)检查。本回顾性队列研究报告了严重 TBI 患者 ICP 测量的并发症发生率,以及后续 CCT 的发现和临床后果。
我们对 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月在城市一级创伤中心接受有创 ICP 测量的严重 TBI 患者进行了回顾性临床病历回顾。
分析了 213 例患者的临床记录。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)平均为 6 分,院内死亡率为 20.7%。总体而言,记录了 12 例(5.6%)与有创 ICP 测量相关的并发症,其中 5 例需要手术干预。192 例患者(89.7%)进行了后续 CCT 扫描。进行后续 CCT 的指征包括无临床恶化的常规影像学检查(n=137,64.3%)和 ICP 值升高和/或临床恶化(n=55,25.8%)。与常规进行的 CCT 扫描相比,基于临床恶化和 ICP 值升高进行的后续影像学检查发现 CCT 结果恶化的可能性显著增加,优势比分别为 5.524(95%CI 1.625-18.773)和 6.977(95%CI 3.262-14.926)。6 例患者(3.1%)因后续 CCT 影像学检查结果而接受了手术干预。
在我们的研究人群中,有创 ICP 监测在严重 TBI 患者中是安全的,并发症发生率可接受。我们发现了大量的后续 CCT。我们的结果表明,只有在 ICP 值升高和/或临床恶化的患者中,才应考虑对接受有创 ICP 监测的患者进行 CCT 成像。