Kaur Jasleen, McNamara Susan
University Of Connecticut
Private Practice
Restraints and seclusion are often used in mental health settings to manage the behavior of patients and minimize the perceived risk of danger, at times leading to patient harm or abuse. An international consensus acknowledges that there are adverse physical and psychological consequences from using restraints and seclusion and that these practices should be reduced or eliminated. The use of restraints and seclusion can lead to patient falls, pressure injuries, positional asphyxiation, musculoskeletal injuries, drug reactions, and even death. Families and staff members may experience helplessness, distress, and injuries. The primary goal of behavioral interventions is to help the patient regain control over their behavior, thereby enabling meaningful participation in treatment. The United States Code of Federal Regulations specifies that all patients have the right to be free from restraints and seclusion when used as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation.[Code of Federal Regulations. §482.13] Restraints and seclusion may only be used when other less restrictive measures are unavailing to secure the immediate physical safety of the patient or others, and restraints and seclusion must be discontinued as soon as it is safe to do so. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) publication , implementing a recovery approach is essential for individuals overcoming life challenges. Recovery-oriented mental health services are not coercion-based, and instead provide hope, empowerment, choices, and opportunities. Several strategies can be used to respond to tense situations without escalating to the use of restraints or seclusion, including: Developing individualized treatment plans to explore patients' needs and preferences, including how they wish to be responded to when they have signs of distress. Calming actions should be tailored to each individual and each situation. Using de-escalation techniques to engage individuals and establish a collaborative relationship when they are extremely distressed or upset to resolve or defuse the situation. De-escalation includes active listening, a structured form of listening that focuses full attention on what someone is saying to understand the true meaning of what is said and the reason behind the person's distress. Fostering a and culture that creates a nonjudgmental space to consider how decisions are reached and whether it is possible to say instead of to a patient's request. Creating supportive environments, including the use of comfort rooms as places of sanctuary and healing. Establishing a response team of experienced and committed individuals who can intervene when a conflict arises using good communication, de-escalation techniques, and violence prevention skills to safely resolve the situation. All staff should receive training in trauma-informed care, sensory modulation techniques, wellness or recovery, and de-escalation techniques, such as active listening. There is a lack of uniformity and clarity in describing different types of restraints and seclusion, and how they are implemented in actual practice. This inconsistency makes it challenging to accurately measure and understand the true usage of restraints or seclusion in different settings. According to the WHO, the types of restraints and seclusion include the following: : Seclusion refers to the practice of isolating an individual by physically restricting their ability to leave a designated area. This practice can be done by locking someone in a certain space, by locking access doors, restricting an individual's movement to a certain area by telling them they are not allowed to leave, or intimidating them to stay in a certain space. Patients who are in seclusion are at risk of intentional self-harm. Manual restraint or holding refers to hands-on control of a person without the use of a device. This practice may involve physical struggles using force and includes painful positions to exert control, such as arm-twisting. Prone or face-down manual restraints are common and risk positional suffocation and sudden death. Manual holds are the most commonly used form of restraint. Physical or mechanical restraint refers to the use of devices to immobilize an individual or their ability to freely move a part of their body. Physical and mechanical restraints include ambulatory restraints such as belts, ropes, chains, shackles, straitjackets, disabling gloves or mittens, and disabling furniture, such as restraint beds with wrist, body, or ankle straps; cage beds; net beds; and restraint chairs. Restraint chairs prevent patients from standing using seat belts and limb restraints, lap trays, or structural design that the patient can not self-release. Restraint chairs have advantages over other physical or mechanical restraint devices, as their upright position is better for a patient's dignity and sense of control. The upright position reduces the risk of oxygen desaturation, allows for eye contact with staff, and avoids the vulnerable supine position with splayed extremities, which is not trauma-sensitive. Chair restraints are associated with shorter periods of restraint, increased likelihood of patients accepting oral medications, and reduced incidence of staff injuries. Chemical restraint refers to the use of medications that are not part of the individual's standard treatment and are administered against the person's will to control their movement or behavior. Common drug classes include benzodiazepines and antipsychotic medications. . According to the Center for Medicare Services, within 1 hour of initiating seclusion or restraint, a patient must be evaluated face-to-face by a clinician or other licensed independent practitioner or by a registered nurse or physician assistant who has met specified training requirements. This requirement may be more restrictive and varies by state laws. Many times, a combination of restraints and seclusion techniques is used. All these interventions fall under the umbrella of coercive practices associated with physical and psychological harm, including feelings of humiliation and retraumatization. Patients who are restrained are unable to care for their personal needs, such as using the toilet or showering, and at times are deprived of personal items, shoes, pillows, and blankets. Coercive practices disrupt the therapeutic relationship between members of the interprofessional team and the patient. When using restraints and seclusion as a last resort, the restraint team should include sufficient team members to safely treat the patient. Policies and procedures on how to safely restrain and seclude patients vary by setting, and institutional guidelines should be consulted. The Joint Commission requires time-limited orders in accordance with laws and regulations. There is no evidence-based research supporting the idea that restraints and seclusion are therapeutic or diminish aggression. Higher risk for the use of coercive measures is associated with the following characteristics: Male gender. Single or divorced marital status. Receipt of disability benefits. History of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Younger age. Diagnosis of psychotic and bipolar illnesses. Involuntary admission. Staff stressors contributing to the use of coercive practices include heavy workloads, understaffing, poor training, and misperceptions about a patient's behavior.
约束和隔离在精神卫生环境中经常被用于管理患者行为并将感知到的危险风险降至最低,有时会导致患者受到伤害或虐待。国际共识承认,使用约束和隔离会产生不良的身体和心理后果,这些做法应予以减少或消除。使用约束和隔离可能导致患者跌倒、压疮、体位性窒息、肌肉骨骼损伤、药物反应,甚至死亡。家属和工作人员可能会感到无助、痛苦和受伤。行为干预的主要目标是帮助患者重新控制自己的行为,从而能够有意义地参与治疗。美国联邦法规规定,当约束和隔离被用作强制、惩戒、便利或报复手段时,所有患者都有权免受其害。[联邦法规。§482.13] 只有在其他限制较小的措施无法确保患者或他人的即时人身安全时,才可以使用约束和隔离,并且一旦安全就必须立即停止使用。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的出版物,实施康复方法对于个人克服生活挑战至关重要。以康复为导向的精神卫生服务不是基于强制的,而是提供希望、赋权、选择和机会。 可以使用几种策略来应对紧张局势而不升级到使用约束或隔离,包括:制定个性化治疗计划以探索患者的需求和偏好,包括当他们出现痛苦迹象时希望如何得到回应。安抚行动应根据每个人和每种情况进行调整。当个人极度痛苦或心烦意乱时,使用降级技术与他们接触并建立合作关系以解决或化解局势。降级包括积极倾听,这是一种结构化的倾听形式,将全部注意力集中在某人所说的话上,以理解所说内容的真正含义以及此人痛苦背后的原因。营造一种文化氛围,创造一个无评判的空间,以考虑如何做出决策以及是否有可能对患者的请求说“是”而不是“否”。营造支持性环境,包括使用舒适房间作为避难和康复的场所。建立一个由经验丰富且敬业的人员组成的应对团队,当冲突出现时,他们可以使用良好的沟通、降级技术和暴力预防技能进行干预,以安全地解决局势。所有工作人员都应接受创伤知情护理、感觉调节技术、健康或康复以及降级技术(如积极倾听)方面的培训。 在描述不同类型的约束和隔离以及它们在实际操作中如何实施方面,缺乏统一性和清晰度。这种不一致使得准确衡量和理解不同环境中约束或隔离的实际使用情况具有挑战性。根据世界卫生组织的说法,约束和隔离的类型包括以下几种:隔离是指通过身体限制个人离开指定区域的能力来隔离个人的做法。这种做法可以通过将某人锁在某个空间、锁上通道门、告诉他们不允许离开而将个人的行动限制在某个区域或吓唬他们留在某个空间来实现。处于隔离状态的患者有故意自我伤害的风险。手动约束或控制是指在不使用设备的情况下对人进行亲身控制。这种做法可能涉及使用武力进行身体挣扎,包括使用痛苦的姿势来施加控制,如扭胳膊。俯卧或脸朝下的手动约束很常见,有体位性窒息和猝死的风险。手动控制是最常用的约束形式。身体或机械约束是指使用设备使个人无法移动或限制其身体某部分自由移动的能力。身体和机械约束包括可移动的约束,如腰带、绳索、链条、手铐、紧身衣、致残手套或连指手套,以及致残家具,如带有手腕、身体或脚踝绑带的约束床;笼床;网床;和约束椅。约束椅通过安全带和肢体约束、膝上托盘或患者无法自行解脱的结构设计来防止患者站立。约束椅比其他身体或机械约束设备有优势,因为其直立位置更有利于患者的尊严和控制感。直立位置降低了氧饱和度降低的风险,允许与工作人员进行眼神交流,并避免了四肢张开的易受伤害的仰卧姿势,这种姿势对创伤不敏感。椅子约束与较短的约束时间、患者接受口服药物的可能性增加以及工作人员受伤发生率降低有关。化学约束是指使用不属于个人标准治疗的药物,并违背个人意愿给药以控制其行动或行为。常见的药物类别包括苯二氮䓬类药物和抗精神病药物。 根据医疗保险服务中心的规定,在开始隔离或约束后的1小时内,患者必须由临床医生或其他持牌独立从业者或由符合特定培训要求的注册护士或医师助理进行面对面评估。这一要求可能更具限制性,并且因州法律而异。很多时候,会结合使用约束和隔离技术。所有这些干预措施都属于与身体和心理伤害相关的强制做法的范畴,包括羞辱感和再次创伤。被约束的患者无法照顾自己的个人需求,如使用厕所或洗澡,有时还会被剥夺个人物品、鞋子、枕头和毯子。强制做法破坏了跨专业团队成员与患者之间的治疗关系。当作为最后手段使用约束和隔离时,约束团队应包括足够的团队成员以安全地治疗患者。关于如何安全地约束和隔离患者的政策和程序因环境而异,应参考机构指南。联合委员会要求根据法律法规下达限时命令。没有基于证据的研究支持约束和隔离具有治疗作用或能减少攻击行为的观点。 使用强制措施的较高风险与以下特征相关:男性。单身或离婚的婚姻状况。领取残疾福利。多次住院治疗的精神病史。年龄较小。精神病和双相情感障碍的诊断。非自愿入院。导致使用强制做法的工作人员压力源包括工作量大、人员不足、培训不足以及对患者行为的误解。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-25
Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-7-28
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024-6
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025-6-30