Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌微创前哨淋巴结活检与根治性淋巴结清扫术围手术期结局的比较

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Sentinel Node Biopsy and Full Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

作者信息

Tait David L, Lehman Alanna, Brown Jubilee, Crane Erin K, Kemp Erin V, Taylor Valerie D, Naumann R Wendel

机构信息

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina (all authors)..

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina (all authors).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Aug;28(8):1514-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.019. Epub 2020 Dec 20.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To review the perioperative differences between patients undergoing a minimally invasive sentinel lymph node dissection and those undergoing a full lymphadenectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing a minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer that included nodal evaluation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy were compared with those who underwent a full lymphadenectomy at the time of minimally invasive surgery by either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 241 minimally invasive surgery procedures for endometrial cancer were performed during the 20-month study period. Nodal dissection was indicated and performed in 156 (65%) of these patients, with 93 undergoing a sentinel lymph node biopsy and 63 a full lymphadenectomy. There was no difference between the sentinel group and the lymphadenectomy group with respect to age, estimated blood loss (p = .23), use of a preoperative enhanced recovery after surgery program (p = .82), or body mass index (34.0 kg/m vs 33.7 kg/m; p = .87). The use of full lymphadenectomy was very dependent on the surgeon (p <.001). There was no difference in narcotic use in milligram intravenous equivalents of morphine in surgery (20.9 vs 22.2; p = .37), recovery (4.6 vs 4.9; p = .73), or total dose (25.4 vs 27.0; p = .33). The surgical procedure was longer with lymphadenectomy (185.2 minutes vs 214.2 minutes; p <.001) and the relative risk of discharge from recovery was lower (0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.97; p = .03). The hospital stay was longer with lymphadenectomy (16.3 hours vs 25.5 hours; p <.001) and same-day discharge less frequent (48.5% vs 13.8%; p <.001). A multivariate analysis confirmed that sentinel node biopsy was associated with an increased relative risk of discharge of 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.53; p = .01) CONCLUSION: Total narcotic requirements are similar between sentinel node biopsy and lymphadenectomy. However, sentinel node biopsy is associated with a shorter surgical time, recovery time, and hospital stay.

摘要

研究目的

回顾接受微创前哨淋巴结清扫术的患者与接受根治性淋巴结切除术的患者在围手术期的差异。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

教学医院。

患者

所有接受包括淋巴结评估在内的子宫内膜癌微创手术的患者。

干预措施

将接受前哨淋巴结活检的患者与在微创手术时接受根治性淋巴结切除术的患者进行比较,手术方式为腹腔镜手术或机器人辅助手术。

测量指标及主要结果

在20个月的研究期间,共进行了241例子宫内膜癌微创手术。其中156例(65%)患者有指征并进行了淋巴结清扫,93例接受了前哨淋巴结活检,63例接受了根治性淋巴结切除术。前哨淋巴结组和淋巴结清扫组在年龄、估计失血量(p = 0.23)、术前是否采用术后加速康复方案(p = 0.82)或体重指数(34.0kg/m²对33.7kg/m²;p = 0.87)方面无差异。根治性淋巴结切除术的采用很大程度上取决于外科医生(p < 0.001)。手术中吗啡静脉等效毫克数的麻醉药物使用量在两组间无差异(20.9对22.2;p = 0.37),恢复阶段(4.6对4.9;p = 0.73)或总剂量(25.4对27.0;p = 0.33)也无差异。淋巴结清扫术的手术时间更长(185.2分钟对214.2分钟;p < 0.001),恢复室出院的相对风险更低(0.71;95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.97;p = 0.03)。淋巴结清扫术患者的住院时间更长(16.3小时对25.5小时;p < 0.001),当日出院的频率更低(48.5%对13.8%;p < 0.001)。多因素分析证实,前哨淋巴结活检与出院相对风险增加1.68相关(95%置信区间1.11 - 2.53;p = 0.01)。结论:前哨淋巴结活检和淋巴结清扫术的总麻醉药物需求量相似。然而,前哨淋巴结活检与更短的手术时间、恢复时间和住院时间相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验