Juárez-Juárez Brenda, Cuautle Mariana, Castillo-Guevara Citlalli, López-Vázquez Karla, Gómez-Ortigoza María, Gómez-Lazaga María, Díaz-Castelazo Cecilia, Lara Carlos, Pérez-Toledo Gibrán R, Reyes Miguel
Maestría en Biotecnología y Manejo de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, San Felipe Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, Mexico.
Departamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 7;8:e10435. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10435. eCollection 2020.
Ant-plant mutualistic networks tend to have a nested structure that contributes to their stability, but the ecological factors that give rise to this structure are not fully understood. Here, we evaluate whether ant abundance and dominance hierarchy determine the structure of the ant-plant networks in two types of vegetation: oak and grassland, in two temperate environments of Mexico: Flor del Bosque State Park (FBSP) and La Malinche National Park (MNP). We predicted that dominant and abundant ant species make up the core, and submissives, the periphery of the network. We also expected a higher specialization level in the ant trophic level than in plant trophic level due to competition among the ant species for the plant-derived resources.
The ant-plant interaction network was obtained from the frequency of ant-plant interactions. We calculated a dominance hierarchy index for the ants using sampling with baits and evaluated their abundance using pitfall traps.
In MNP, the spp. species complex formed the core of the network (in both the oak forest and the grassland), while in FBSP, the core species were (oak forest) and (grassland). Although these core species were dominant in their respective sites, they were not necessarily the most dominant ant species. Three of the four networks (oak forest and grassland in FBSP, and oak forest in MNP) were nested and had a higher number of plant species than ant species. Although greater specialization was observed in the ant trophic level in the two sites and vegetations, possibly due to competition with the more dominant ant species, this was not statistically significant. In three of these networks (grassland and oak forest of MNP and oak forest of FBSP), we found no correlation between the dominance hierarchy and abundance of the ant species and their position within the network. However, a positive correlation was found between the nestedness contribution value and ant dominance hierarchy in the grassland of the site FBSP, which could be due to the richer ant-plant network and higher dominance index of this community.
Our evidence suggests that ant abundance and dominance hierarchy have little influence on network structure in temperate ecosystems, probably due to the species-poor ant-plant network and a dominance hierarchy formed only by the presence of dominant and submissive species with no intermediate dominant species between them (absence of gradient in hierarchy) in these ecosystems.
蚂蚁与植物的互利网络往往具有嵌套结构,这有助于其稳定性,但导致这种结构的生态因素尚未完全明了。在此,我们评估蚂蚁的丰富度和优势等级是否决定了墨西哥两个温带环境中两种植被类型(橡树林和草原)的蚂蚁 - 植物网络结构,这两个环境分别是弗洛尔德博斯克州立公园(FBSP)和拉马林切国家公园(MNP)。我们预测优势且丰富的蚂蚁物种构成网络的核心,而顺从的物种构成网络的外围。由于蚂蚁物种之间对植物衍生资源的竞争,我们还预期蚂蚁营养级别的专业化水平高于植物营养级别的专业化水平。
蚂蚁 - 植物相互作用网络通过蚂蚁 - 植物相互作用的频率获得。我们使用诱饵采样计算蚂蚁的优势等级指数,并使用陷阱诱捕器评估它们的丰富度。
在MNP, 物种复合体构成了网络的核心(在橡树林和草原中皆是),而在FBSP,核心物种是 (橡树林)和 (草原)。尽管这些核心物种在各自的地点占主导地位,但它们不一定是最具优势的蚂蚁物种。四个网络中的三个(FBSP的橡树林和草原,以及MNP的橡树林)是嵌套的,并且植物物种数量多于蚂蚁物种数量。尽管在两个地点和植被类型中,蚂蚁营养级别观察到了更高的专业化程度,这可能是由于与更具优势的蚂蚁物种竞争所致,但这在统计学上并不显著。在这些网络中的三个(MNP的草原和橡树林以及FBSP的橡树林)中,我们发现蚂蚁物种的优势等级和丰富度与其在网络中的位置之间没有相关性。然而,在FBSP地点的草原中,嵌套贡献值与蚂蚁优势等级之间发现了正相关,这可能是由于该群落中更丰富的蚂蚁 - 植物网络和更高的优势指数。
我们的证据表明,蚂蚁的丰富度和优势等级对温带生态系统中的网络结构影响很小,这可能是由于这些生态系统中蚂蚁 - 植物网络物种贫乏,且优势等级仅由优势物种和顺从物种的存在形成而它们之间没有中间优势物种(等级中不存在梯度)。