• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种量化眶周形态的新方法:直接、二维和三维技术的比较。

A novel approach quantifying the periorbital morphology: A comparison of direct, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional technologies.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Eye Center, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1888-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.003
PMID:33358464
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of anatomical structures is critical in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, few detailed and standardized measurements have been widely used in the periorbital region. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel detailed and standardized protocol with 2D and 3D technologies, and explore the relationship between them and direct measurements.

METHODS

Fifty healthy Caucasians (100 eyes) between 20 and 68 years old were recruited and captured for 3D photographs by VECTRA M3 3D Imaging System. Subsequently, 24 landmarks were located on each 3D photographs following a standardized protocol, and then 19 linear and 3 angular periorbital variables were measured. Furthermore, two-dimensional (2D) and direct measurements were conducted on each subject and compared with 3D measurements and one another.

RESULTS

The grand r means across all measurements were 0.77, 0.78, and 0.88 for direct vs. 2D values, direct vs. 3D values, and 3D vs. 2D values, respectively. The mean absolute differences were 1 mm (ranging from 0.2 mm to 3.7 mm) between direct and 3D measurements, 1 mm (ranging from 0.04 mm to 2.4 mm) between direct and 2D measurements, and 1 mm and 6.6° (ranging from 0.04 mm or 0.5° to 3 mm or 12.8°) between 2D and 3D measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study verified the feasibility of this detailed and standardized landmark localization protocol for assessing the periorbital morphology with 2D and 3D technologies. This protocol may work as a bridge communicating with all studies involving any of the three technologies in the future.

摘要

背景

解剖结构的测量在整形和重建外科中至关重要。然而,在眼眶区域,很少有详细和标准化的测量方法得到广泛应用。本研究旨在评估一种新的详细和标准化方案的可行性,该方案结合了 2D 和 3D 技术,并探讨它们与直接测量之间的关系。

方法

招募了 50 名 20 至 68 岁的健康白种人(100 只眼),并使用 VECTRA M3 3D 成像系统对其进行 3D 摄影。随后,根据标准化方案在每幅 3D 照片上定位 24 个标志点,并测量 19 个线性和 3 个角度的眶周变量。此外,对每个受试者进行二维(2D)和直接测量,并与 3D 测量值进行比较。

结果

所有测量值的总体 grand r 值分别为直接测量值与 2D 值、直接测量值与 3D 值以及 3D 值与 2D 值的 0.77、0.78 和 0.88。直接测量值与 3D 值之间的平均绝对差值为 1mm(范围为 0.2mm 至 3.7mm),直接测量值与 2D 值之间的平均绝对差值为 1mm(范围为 0.04mm 至 2.4mm),2D 值与 3D 值之间的平均绝对差值为 1mm 和 6.6°(范围为 0.04mm 或 0.5°至 3mm 或 12.8°)。

结论

本研究验证了使用 2D 和 3D 技术评估眶周形态的详细和标准化标志点定位方案的可行性。该方案可作为未来涉及这三种技术中任何一种技术的所有研究之间的桥梁。

相似文献

1
A novel approach quantifying the periorbital morphology: A comparison of direct, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional technologies.一种量化眶周形态的新方法:直接、二维和三维技术的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1888-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
A Simple Standardized Three-Dimensional Anthropometry for the Periocular Region in a European Population.一种适用于欧洲人群眶周区域的简单标准化三维人体测量法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):514e-523e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006555.
3
Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.三维数字体视摄影测量眶周人体测量学的可靠性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;257(11):2517-2531. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04428-6. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
4
Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of eyelid aging among Chinese women.中国女性眼睑衰老的三维人体测量分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan;74(1):135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Evaluation of the Portable Next-Generation VECTRA H2 3D Imaging System for Measuring Upper Eyelid Area and Volume.评估便携式下一代 VECTRA H2 3D 成像系统测量上眼睑面积和体积的能力。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Sep 14;43(10):1114-1123. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad136.
6
Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans.基于侧面照片与三维面部扫描对面部软组织轮廓的评估。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):70-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0055-z. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques.眼周人体测量学的可靠性:直接测量法、二维测量法和三维测量法的比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Sep;46(9):e23-e31. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002243.
8
Accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional photography versus 3-dimensional soft tissue imaging.二维摄影与三维软组织成像的准确性和可靠性
Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Mar;50(1):15-22. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.15. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Digital Photogrammetry for Assessing Medial Canthal Tendon Laxity: Novel Standardized Three-Dimensional Versus Traditional Two-Dimensional Lateral Distraction Test.数字摄影测量评估内眦肌腱松弛:新型标准化三维与传统二维外侧牵开试验比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;80(6):1033-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
A novel standardized approach for the 3D evaluation of upper eyelid area and volume.一种用于上睑区域和容积三维评估的新型标准化方法。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1686-1698. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-589. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Harmony and Balance of the Facial Organs for a Natural Face Beauty: A Novel Perspective for Cosmetic/Aesthetic Interventions.面部器官的和谐与平衡成就自然之美:美容/美学干预的新视角
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 22;61(6):958. doi: 10.3390/medicina61060958.
2
Racial and sexual differences of eyebrow and eyelid morphology: three-dimensional analysis in young Caucasian and Chinese populations.眉毛和眼睑形态的种族及性别差异:年轻白种人和中国人群的三维分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):882-897. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1113. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Editorial: Insights in surgical ophthalmology: 2023.
社论:2023年眼科手术洞察
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 17;4:1407362. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1407362. eCollection 2024.
4
Grand Challenges and Opportunities in Surgical Ophthalmology: Together for a Shared Future.眼科手术的重大挑战与机遇:携手共创共享未来。
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 4;2:922240. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.922240. eCollection 2022.
5
The role of the lateral tarsal strip procedure in modern ophthalmic plastic surgery-A review.外侧睑板条手术在现代眼科整形手术中的作用——综述
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 26;2:871964. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.871964. eCollection 2022.
6
Periocular Asymmetry Index in Caucasian Populations Using Three-dimensional Photogrammetry Assessment.基于三维摄影测量评估的白种人群眶周不对称指数。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov;48(21):4489-4499. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04125-8. Epub 2024 May 28.
7
A three-dimensional algorithm for precise measurement of human auricle parameters.一种用于精确测量人耳参数的三维算法。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 10;14(1):10760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61351-5.
8
Quantifying Dermatochalasis Using 3-Dimensional Photogrammetry.使用三维摄影测量法量化上睑皮肤松弛症。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Apr;48(7):1288-1297. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03738-9. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
9
A novel standardized approach for the 3D evaluation of upper eyelid area and volume.一种用于上睑区域和容积三维评估的新型标准化方法。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1686-1698. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-589. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
10
Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Volumetric Measurement of Periocular Tumor Models.眼周肿瘤模型三维体积测量的可重复性
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00595-8. Epub 2022 Oct 16.