• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

躯体形式障碍的结构神经影像学:系统综述。

Structural neuroimaging of somatoform disorders: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

University of Milan, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Mar;122:66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.017. Epub 2020 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.017
PMID:33359097
Abstract

Although there has been an increment in neuroimaging research in somatoform disorders (SD), to date little is known about the neural correlates of these diseases. Therefore, in this systematic, review we aimed at summarizing the existing evidence of structural brain alterations in SD as per DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science) were searched. Only case-control studies using structural neuroimaging were included. Forty-five out of 369 articles fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Compared to controls, subjects with SD showed morphological alterations encompassing motor, limbic and somatosensory circuits. Although far from being conclusive, the results suggested that SD are characterized by selective alterations of large-scale brain networks implicated in cognitive control, emotion regulation and processing, stress and somatic-visceral perception. This review highlights the need for further multimodal neuroimaging studies with longitudinal designs, in larger and better-characterized samples, to elucidate the temporal and causal relationship between neuroanatomical changes and SD, which is paramount for informing tailored treatments.

摘要

尽管躯体形式障碍(SD)的神经影像学研究有所增加,但迄今为止,人们对这些疾病的神经相关性知之甚少。因此,在这项系统综述中,我们旨在根据 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 标准总结 SD 结构脑改变的现有证据。我们检索了三个电子数据库(Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science)。仅纳入使用结构神经影像学的病例对照研究。45 篇文章符合纳入标准并进行了综述。与对照组相比,SD 患者表现出涉及运动、边缘和躯体感觉回路的形态改变。尽管远非结论性的,但结果表明,SD 的特征是与认知控制、情绪调节和处理、应激和躯体-内脏感知相关的大规模脑网络的选择性改变。本综述强调需要进一步进行具有纵向设计、更大和更好特征化样本的多模态神经影像学研究,以阐明神经解剖学变化与 SD 之间的时间和因果关系,这对于提供针对性治疗至关重要。

相似文献

1
Structural neuroimaging of somatoform disorders: A systematic review.躯体形式障碍的结构神经影像学:系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Mar;122:66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.017. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
2
Neural correlates of somatoform disorders from a meta-analytic perspective on neuroimaging studies.从神经影像学研究的元分析角度看躯体形式障碍的神经关联
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Apr 10;11:606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.04.001. eCollection 2016.
3
Structural alterations in functional neurological disorder and related conditions: a software and hardware problem?功能性神经障碍及相关病症的结构改变:软件和硬件问题?
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101798. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101798. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
The Neuroanatomy of Somatoform Disorders: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.躯体形式障碍的神经解剖学:一项磁共振成像研究。
Psychosomatics. 2019 May-Jun;60(3):278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
The Influence of Trauma on Autobiographical Memory in the Assessment of Somatoform Disorders According to DSM IV Criteria.创伤对根据 DSM-IV 标准评估躯体形式障碍的自传体记忆的影响。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Dec;89(4):991-1005. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9597-0.
6
["Somatic symptom disorders" in adolescence. A systematic review of the recent literature].青少年期的“躯体症状障碍”。近期文献的系统综述
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Clinical value of DSM IV and DSM 5 criteria for diagnosing the most prevalent somatoform disorders in patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS).DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 标准在诊断有无法解释的躯体症状(MUPS)的患者中最常见躯体形式障碍的临床价值。
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Mar;82:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Can neuroimaging help us to understand and classify somatoform disorders? A systematic and critical review.神经影像学能否帮助我们理解和分类躯体形式障碍?系统的批判性评价。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Feb-Mar;73(2):173-84. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820824f6. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
9
Predictive validity and clinical utility of DSM-5 Somatic Symptom Disorder--comparison with DSM-IV somatoform disorders and additional criteria for consideration.DSM-5 躯体症状障碍的预测效度和临床实用性——与 DSM-IV 躯体形式障碍的比较及其他考虑标准。
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Nov;73(5):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
10
The relation between the patient health questionnaire-15 and DSM somatic diagnoses.患者健康问卷-15与精神疾病诊断与统计手册躯体诊断之间的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1068-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebellar microstructural abnormalities in patients with somatic symptom disorders.躯体症状障碍患者的小脑微结构异常。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06642-5.
2
Polygenic risk for depression and resting-state functional connectivity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in young adults.年轻人中抑郁症的多基因风险与膝下前扣带回皮质的静息态功能连接性
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025 Jan 14;50(1):E31-E44. doi: 10.1503/jpn.240087. Print 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
Heightened SAM- and HPA-axis activity during acute stress impairs decision-making: A systematic review on underlying neuropharmacological mechanisms.
急性应激期间升高的SAM和HPA轴活动会损害决策:关于潜在神经药理学机制的系统评价
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Jul 3;31:100659. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100659. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Microstructural Differences of the Cerebellum-Thalamus-Basal Ganglia-Limbic Cortex in Patients with Somatic Symptom Disorders: a Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study.躯体症状障碍患者小脑-丘脑-基底节-边缘皮质的微观结构差异:一项扩散峰度成像研究。
Cerebellum. 2023 Oct;22(5):840-851. doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01461-w. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
5
A Longitudinal Study on Attenuated Structural Covariance in Patients With Somatic Symptom Disorder.躯体症状障碍患者结构协方差衰减的纵向研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 17;13:817527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.817527. eCollection 2022.