Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Care, Therapeutic Sciences, Reinarzstr. 49, 47805, Krefeld, Germany; German Sport University Cologne, Department of Further Education, M.Sc. Sport Physiotherapy, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Care, Therapeutic Sciences, Reinarzstr. 49, 47805, Krefeld, Germany.
Gait Posture. 2021 Feb;84:215-220. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.014. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
Previous research showed that standing on textured surfaces can improve postural control by adapting somatosensory inputs from the plantar foot. The additional stimulation of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors by a textured surface during single-leg stance on a balance board may increase afferent information to the central nervous system to accelerate muscular responses and to enhance their accuracy. The additional impact of textured surface during single-leg stance on a balance board on postural control and muscle activity is unknown.
To investigate the differences of a) postural control during single-leg stance on a textured balance board compared to a smooth balance board and b) activity of lower extremity muscles during single-leg stance on a textured balance board compared to a smooth balance board and the floor.
Twenty-six healthy adults (12 females, 14 males; mean age = 25.4 years) were asked to balance on their randomly assigned left or right leg on a force plate (floor; stable condition), a textured balance board and a smooth balance board (unstable conditions). Center of pressure (CoP) displacements (force plate, Bertec, 1000 Hz) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of eight leg muscles were measured and compared between conditions, respectively.
Neither CoP-displacements, nor EMG activities differed significantly between the textured and the smooth balance board (p > 0.05). Significantly higher muscle activities (p < 0.05) were observed using the balance boards compared to the floor.
Single-leg stance using a textured balance board seems not to lead to reduced CoP-displacements compared to a smooth balance board. Muscle activation is significantly increased in both balance board conditions compared to the floor, however, it is not different when both balance board surfaces are compared. It could not be recommended to use a textured balance board for altering muscle activity and improving postural control during single-leg stance in favor of a smooth textured balance board.
先前的研究表明,站在有纹理的表面上可以通过适应足底的本体感觉输入来改善姿势控制。在平衡板上单腿站立时,纹理表面会额外刺激足底皮肤机械感受器,从而增加传入中枢神经系统的信息,加速肌肉反应并提高其准确性。在平衡板上单腿站立时,纹理表面的额外影响对姿势控制和肌肉活动尚不清楚。
研究在平衡板上单腿站立时,a)与光滑平衡板相比,纹理平衡板对姿势控制的影响,b)与光滑平衡板和地面相比,纹理平衡板对下肢肌肉活动的影响的差异。
26 名健康成年人(12 名女性,14 名男性;平均年龄=25.4 岁)被要求随机用左腿或右腿在力板(地面;稳定条件)、纹理平衡板和光滑平衡板上平衡(不稳定条件)。分别在不同条件下测量和比较了中心压力(CoP)位移(力板,Bertec,1000 Hz)和 8 条腿部肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动。
纹理平衡板和光滑平衡板之间的 CoP 位移(p>0.05)或 EMG 活动均无显著差异。与地面相比,使用平衡板时肌肉活动(p<0.05)显著增加。
与光滑平衡板相比,在纹理平衡板上单腿站立似乎不会导致 CoP 位移减少。与地面相比,在两种平衡板条件下肌肉激活均显著增加,但当比较两种平衡板表面时,肌肉激活没有差异。为了改变肌肉活动和改善单腿站立时的姿势控制,不建议使用纹理平衡板,而建议使用光滑纹理平衡板。