Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Carl T. Hayden Phoenix VA Health Care System (111E), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 25;106(4):1150-1162. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa941.
The association of glycemic variability with microvascular disease complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been under-studied and remains unclear. We investigated this relationship using both Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) and the Veteran Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT).
In ACCORD, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was measured 1 to 3 times/year for up to 84 months in 10 251 individuals. In the VADT, FPG was measured every 3 months for up to 87 months in 1791 individuals. Variability measures included coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV) for fasting glucose. The primary composite outcome was time to either severe nephropathy or retinopathy event and secondary outcomes included each outcome individually. To assess the association, we considered variability measures as time-dependent covariates in Cox proportional hazard models. We conducted a meta-analysis across the 2 trials to estimate the risk of fasting glucose variability as well as to assess the heterogenous effects of FPG variability across treatment arms.
In both ACCORD and the VADT, the CV and ARV of FPG were associated with development of future microvascular outcomes even after adjusting for other risk factors, including measures of average glycemic control (ie, cumulative average of HbA1c). Meta-analyses of these 2 trials confirmed these findings and indicated FPG variation may be more harmful in those with less intensive glucose control.
This post hoc analysis indicates that variability of FPG plays a role in, and/or is an independent and readily available marker of, development of microvascular complications in T2D.
血糖变异性与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)微血管疾病并发症的关系研究较少,目前仍不清楚。我们使用 ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES(ACCORD)和 Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial(VADT)研究来调查这种关系。
在 ACCORD 中,10251 名患者的空腹血糖(FPG)在 84 个月内进行了 1 至 3 次测量。在 VADT 中,1791 名患者的 FPG 每 3 个月测量一次,持续 87 个月。血糖变异性的测量指标包括空腹血糖的变异系数(CV)和平均真实变异性(ARV)。主要复合终点是严重肾病或视网膜病变事件的发生时间,次要终点包括每个单独的终点。为了评估这种相关性,我们将变异性测量指标作为 Cox 比例风险模型中的时间依赖性协变量进行考虑。我们对这两项试验进行了荟萃分析,以评估空腹血糖变异性的风险,并评估 FPG 变异性在不同治疗组之间的异质性影响。
在 ACCORD 和 VADT 中,FPG 的 CV 和 ARV 与未来微血管结局的发展相关,即使在调整了其他危险因素(包括 HbA1c 的累积平均值)后也是如此。对这两项试验的荟萃分析证实了这些发现,并表明在血糖控制较不严格的患者中,FPG 变化可能更有害。
这项事后分析表明,FPG 的变异性在 T2D 微血管并发症的发生中起作用,并且/或者是微血管并发症发生的独立且易于获得的标志物。