• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退行性腰椎疾病患者应用 DIAM™ 植入物减压后的三维容积变化和临床结果。

Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes and Clinical Outcomes after Decompression with DIAM™ Implantation in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 21;56(12):723. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120723.

DOI:10.3390/medicina56120723
PMID:33371350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7767335/
Abstract

: The prevalence of degenerative lumbar spine diseases has increased. In addition to standard lumbar decompression and/or fusion techniques, implantation of interspinous process devices (IPDs) can provide clinical benefits in highly selected patients. However, changes in spinal structures after IPD implantation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have rarely been discussed. This volumetric study aimed to evaluate the effect of IPD implantation on the intervertebral disc and foramen using three-dimensional assessment. : We retrospectively reviewed patients with lumbar degenerative disc diseases treated with IPD implantation and foraminotomy and/or discectomy between January 2016 and December 2019. The mean follow-up period was 13.6 months. The perioperative lumbar MRI data were processed for 3D-volumetric analysis. Clinical outcomes, including the Prolo scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic outcomes, such as the disc height, foraminal area, and translation, were analyzed. : Fifty patients were included in our study. At the one-year follow-up, the VAS and Prolo scale scores significantly improved (both < 0.001). The disc height and foraminal area on radiographs also increased significantly, but with limited effects up to three months postoperatively. MRI revealed an increased postoperative disc height with a mean difference of 0.5 ± 0.1 mm ( < 0.001). Although the mean disc volume difference did not significantly increase, the mean foraminal volume difference was 0.4 ± 0.16 mm ( < 0.05). : In select patients with degenerative disc diseases or lumbar spinal stenosis, the intervertebral foramen was enlarged, and disc loading was reduced after IPD implantation with decompression surgery. The 3D findings were compatible with the clinical benefits.

摘要

:退行性腰椎疾病的患病率有所增加。除了标准的腰椎减压和/或融合技术外,在高度选择的患者中,植入棘突间装置(IPD)可以提供临床益处。然而,使用磁共振成像(MRI)很少讨论 IPD 植入后脊柱结构的变化。这项体积研究旨在使用三维评估来评估 IPD 植入对椎间盘和椎间孔的影响。

:我们回顾性地审查了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 IPD 植入和椎间孔切开术和/或椎间盘切除术治疗的腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者。平均随访时间为 13.6 个月。对围手术期腰椎 MRI 数据进行 3D 体积分析。分析临床结果,包括 Prolo 量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,以及影像学结果,如椎间盘高度、椎间孔面积和移位。

:我们的研究纳入了 50 名患者。在一年的随访中,VAS 和 Prolo 量表评分显著改善(均<0.001)。影像学上的椎间盘高度和椎间孔面积也显著增加,但术后三个月内效果有限。MRI 显示术后椎间盘高度增加,平均差异为 0.5±0.1mm(<0.001)。虽然椎间盘体积差异的平均值没有显著增加,但椎间孔体积差异的平均值为 0.4±0.16mm(<0.05)。

:在患有退行性椎间盘疾病或腰椎管狭窄症的选择患者中,IPD 植入减压手术后椎间孔扩大,椎间盘负荷减轻。三维发现与临床益处相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/1a96471d3944/medicina-56-00723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/b166b485ec15/medicina-56-00723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/9074812cf084/medicina-56-00723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/9ef9a647499d/medicina-56-00723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/fbb8d3d1d362/medicina-56-00723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/1a96471d3944/medicina-56-00723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/b166b485ec15/medicina-56-00723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/9074812cf084/medicina-56-00723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/9ef9a647499d/medicina-56-00723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/fbb8d3d1d362/medicina-56-00723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2615/7767335/1a96471d3944/medicina-56-00723-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes and Clinical Outcomes after Decompression with DIAM™ Implantation in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases.退行性腰椎疾病患者应用 DIAM™ 植入物减压后的三维容积变化和临床结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 21;56(12):723. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120723.
2
[The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].[用于治疗腰骶部脊柱退行性疾病的DIAM脊柱稳定系统]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.
3
Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.用于腰椎管狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病的棘突间撑开减压术(X-STOP):一项至少随访3年的多中心研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
5
Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间植入物(X Stop、Wallis、Diam):放射学参数与临床结果之间存在相关性吗?
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1494-503. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1081-y. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
6
Reduction in adjacent-segment degeneration after multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion with proximal DIAM implantation.后路多节段腰椎间融合联合近端 DIAM 植入物后邻近节段退变的减少。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):190-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14666. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
Change of radiological parameters after interspinous implantation (X-stop®) in degenerative spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症经棘突间植入(X-stop®)后影像学参数的变化
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Apr;23(3):281-5. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-0986-z. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation.150 例连续患者采用 DIAM™ 植入术治疗腰椎管狭窄症和椎间盘突出症的生存分析。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Feb;20(2):280-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1599-z. Epub 2010 Oct 17.
9
Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.棘突间减压装置的失败率和并发症:一项欧洲多中心研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E14. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15244.
10
[Dynamic neutralization using the Dynesys system for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine].[使用Dynesys系统进行动态中和治疗腰椎间盘退变疾病]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Jun;77(3):203-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Using the DIAM Stabilizer and Standard Rehabilitation Program: A Preliminary Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up.使用DIAM稳定器和标准康复计划对退行性腰椎疾病患者的早期和长期结果进行比较分析:一项为期1年随访的初步前瞻性随机对照试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 13;11(22):2956. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222956.
2
The effect of lifting load on the kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous process in vivo.体内提升负荷对腰椎棘突运动学特征的影响。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Jun;45(6):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03135-6. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.不同腰椎棘突间装置的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e1112-e1119. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.051. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
2
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume.退行性腰椎疾病:全球发病率及全球病例数估计
Global Spine J. 2018 Dec;8(8):784-794. doi: 10.1177/2192568218770769. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
15-year survivorship analysis of an interspinous device in surgery for single-level lumbar disc herniation.
单节段腰椎间盘突出症手术中棘突间装置 15 年的生存分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 9;22(1):1030. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04929-8.
后路腰椎椎间融合术、Coflex、Wallis和X-stop治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;172:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Lumbar disc herniation surgery with microdiscectomy plus interspinous stabilization: Good clinical results, but failure to lower the incidence of re-operation.腰椎间盘突出症手术采用显微椎间盘切除术加棘突间稳定术:临床效果良好,但未能降低再次手术的发生率。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 May;51:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Long-term results with percutaneous interspinous process devices in the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication.经皮棘突间装置治疗神经源性间歇性跛行的长期疗效
J Spine Surg. 2017 Dec;3(4):620-623. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.11.07.
6
Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.棘突间植入物:新一代植入物是否优于上一代?一篇综述。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z.
7
Clinical outcome following DIAM implantation for symptomatic lumbar internal disk disruption: a 3-year retrospective analysis.症状性腰椎间盘内破裂行DIAM植入后的临床结果:一项3年回顾性分析。
J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 31;9:917-924. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S115847. eCollection 2016.
8
Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开器与传统减压术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;2(1):31-40. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.01.07.
9
Interspinous spacers versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.棘突间撑开器与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病:前瞻性研究的Meta分析
Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3139-x. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
10
Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.棘突间减压装置的失败率和并发症:一项欧洲多中心研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E14. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15244.