Is Peer Review a Hindrance to Good Science or a Gatekeeper Against Bad Science?

作者信息

Ramasamy Akilesh

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Karaikal, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;79(4):745-747. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.033

PMID:33373592

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Is Peer Review a Hindrance to Good Science or a Gatekeeper Against Bad Science?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;79(4):745-747. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Commentary on Cicchetti's "reliability of peer review".

Teach Learn Med. 2002 Summer;14(3):142-3. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_1.

Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.

Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.06.001.

Analysis of three factors possibly influencing the outcome of a science review process.

Account Res. 2014;21(4):241-64. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.848798.

Peer review to select academic job applicants.

Nature. 2002 Nov 7;420(6911):16. doi: 10.1038/420016b.

Science behind reviewing.

J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 May;63(5):656-8.

Good news--and bad.

Science. 2006 Jan 13;311(5758):145. doi: 10.1126/science.1124498.

Peer review: A culture of science and service.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2024 Sep;155(9):725-726. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Refereeing: What football can teach science.

Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):329. doi: 10.1038/516329e.

Giving science a bad name.

J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Apr;57(4):291-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Is Peer Review a Hindrance to Good Science or a Gatekeeper Against Bad Science?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;79(4):745-747. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Commentary on Cicchetti's "reliability of peer review".

Teach Learn Med. 2002 Summer;14(3):142-3. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_1.

Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.

Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.06.001.

Analysis of three factors possibly influencing the outcome of a science review process.

Account Res. 2014;21(4):241-64. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.848798.

Peer review to select academic job applicants.

Nature. 2002 Nov 7;420(6911):16. doi: 10.1038/420016b.

Science behind reviewing.

J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 May;63(5):656-8.

Good news--and bad.

Science. 2006 Jan 13;311(5758):145. doi: 10.1126/science.1124498.

Peer review: A culture of science and service.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2024 Sep;155(9):725-726. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Refereeing: What football can teach science.

Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):329. doi: 10.1038/516329e.

Giving science a bad name.

J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Apr;57(4):291-3.