Balilah Mohammad, Babgi Mohammad, Alnemari Walaa, Binjabi Ahmad, Zaini Rania, Abdulkhaliq Altaf, Monjed Alaa, Aldahlawi Salwa, Almoallim Hani
Department of Medical Education, Rabigh Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Dec 22;11:1005-1013. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S282582. eCollection 2020.
Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is increasingly used in different fields of education, including medical education, due to its established advantages. However, there are scarce data about the best practice guidelines for PAL program evaluation. The aim of this work was to develop a framework that can describe and develop PAL programs and consequently provide a tool for evaluation and comparison of PAL programs among different institutions.
A thorough literature review was made for assessment of different PAL programs development and implementation strategies, and PAL leaders at the University of Umm Al-Qura in Saudi Arabia were interviewed for development and revision of a framework for PAL program development, description and evaluation.
A framework of four sections was developed ie context, theory, implementation processes and outcomes, and emergence. The context includes the learning objectives and the logistics. The theory includes the content nature, program design, number of tutees and tutors, participation, program orientation, program duration and timing, tutor recruitment and preparation and faculty involvement. Implementation process and outcome section includes the feedback collection and the pre- and post-intervention students' assessment. The emergence includes tracking the program evolution.
Development of a clear well-defined framework for description, implementation and evaluation of a PAL educational program can provide a foundation to unify the terms organizations use to communicate the parameters of PAL programs and overcome the jargon about PAL in the literature. It also can provide comparisons between the programs in an attempt to set best practice guidelines in the future for PAL program developing and implementation.
同伴辅助学习(PAL)因其已被证实的优势而越来越多地应用于包括医学教育在内的不同教育领域。然而,关于PAL项目评估的最佳实践指南的数据却很匮乏。这项工作的目的是开发一个框架,该框架能够描述和开发PAL项目,并因此提供一种工具,用于评估和比较不同机构的PAL项目。
对不同的PAL项目开发和实施策略进行了全面的文献综述,并采访了沙特阿拉伯乌姆古拉大学的PAL负责人,以制定、完善PAL项目开发、描述和评估的框架。
开发了一个由四个部分组成的框架,即背景、理论、实施过程与结果以及发展情况。背景包括学习目标和后勤保障。理论包括内容性质、项目设计、学员和导师数量、参与情况、项目导向、项目时长和时间安排、导师招募与准备以及教师参与情况。实施过程与结果部分包括反馈收集以及干预前后学生的评估。发展情况包括跟踪项目的演变。
为PAL教育项目的描述、实施和评估制定一个清晰明确的框架,可以为统一各组织用于交流PAL项目参数的术语提供基础,并克服文献中关于PAL的行话。它还可以对各项目进行比较,以便未来为PAL项目的开发和实施制定最佳实践指南。