Suppr超能文献

营养良好的消防员补充多种微量营养素与免疫球蛋白反应

Multi-Micronutrient Supplementation and Immunoglobulin Response in Well-Fed Firefighters.

作者信息

Santos José Augusto Rodrigues, Fernandes Ricardo J, Zacca Rodrigo

机构信息

Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP‑UP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Sports Med Int Open. 2020 Dec 17;5(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1055/a-1296-1486. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Intensive physical training programs can affect the immune system. This study aims to verify the multi-micronutrient supplementation effects on serum immunoglobulins levels prior to and after a five-week physical training program. Twenty-four male recruit firefighters were randomly allocated into supplemented (with Prisfar Ever-Fit Plus over 35 consecutive days) and placebo groups (n=12 each). Serum immunoglobulins G, A, and M were assessed. Supplementation effect was detected for immunoglobulin G (eta-squared, η : 0.09; =0.035; power: 0.56), A (η : 0.24; =0.001; power: 0.95), and M (η : 0.09; =0.036; power: 0.56). Although immunoglobulin A was different between groups at baseline (mean difference: 42.58; 95%CI: 7.00 to 78.16 mg/dL; =0.021; =2.48), within-group (before vs after five weeks) showed no differences for both supplemented and control groups. In addition, even if immunoglobulin G and M were similar at baseline, immunoglobulin G decreased (mean diff.: 46.4; 95%CI: 6.7 to 86.1 mg/dL; =0.03; =0.74) and immunoglobulin M increased (mean diff.: -10.7; 95%CI: -15.8 to -5.5 mg/dL; =0.001; =-1.33) in the control group. Although mean values remained within the reference values, changes observed for immunoglobulin G and M may reflect some immune protection for firefighters engaged in recruit training.

摘要

高强度体育训练计划会影响免疫系统。本研究旨在验证在为期五周的体育训练计划前后,多种微量营养素补充剂对血清免疫球蛋白水平的影响。24名男性新入职消防员被随机分为补充组(连续35天服用普丽普莱全效营养片)和安慰剂组(每组n = 12)。评估血清免疫球蛋白G、A和M。检测到补充剂对免疫球蛋白G(偏 eta 平方,η²:0.09;P = 0.035;检验效能:0.56)、A(η²:0.24;P = 0.001;检验效能:0.95)和M(η²:0.09;P = 0.036;检验效能:0.56)有影响。尽管基线时两组之间免疫球蛋白A存在差异(平均差异:42.58;95%置信区间:7.00至78.16mg/dL;P = 0.021;效应量 = 2.48),但补充组和对照组在组内(五周前与五周后)均未显示出差异。此外,即使免疫球蛋白G和M在基线时相似,但对照组中免疫球蛋白G下降(平均差异:46.4;95%置信区间:6.7至- 86.1mg/dL;P = 0.03;效应量 = 0.74),免疫球蛋白M增加(平均差异:- 10.7;95%置信区间:- 15.8至- 5.5mg/dL;P = 0.001;效应量 = - 1.33)。尽管平均值仍在参考值范围内,但免疫球蛋白G和M的变化可能反映了对参加新兵训练的消防员的一些免疫保护作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a4/7758155/b62b10a2f88f/10-1055-a-1296-1486-i03-2020-0149-0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验