• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜手术与开放手术切除治疗鼻窦恶性肿瘤的手术效果

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for the management of sinonasal malignancies.

作者信息

Rajendran Balamurugan

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon and Oral Implantologist, RYA Cosmo Foundation, Chennai, India.

出版信息

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec 31;46(6):373-378. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.373.

DOI:10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.373
PMID:33377461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783184/
Abstract

The purpose of this review is to assess the surgical outcomes of two different treatment modalities, endoscopic and open resection, for the management of sinonasal malignancies by comparing the effectiveness of these two methods. A wide search was carried out considering various electronic databases for English language articles from 2013 to 2018 using keywords such as sinonasal malignancies, endoscopic surgery, open resection for sinonasal malignancies, and endoscopic versus open surgery. One thousand articles were identified from the literature for screening. After a thorough systematic assessment and based on the selection criteria, 10 articles with 4,642 patients were included in this quantitative analysis. With a total of 4,642 patients, 1,730 patients were operated on using endoscopic resection and 2,912 patients were operated on using open resection. The endoscopic approach was found to have a shorter hospital stay compared to open surgical resection (<0.05). The rate of positive margins and the recurrence rate for open surgical resection were both smaller compared to those for endoscopic resection (>0.05), and the endoscopic approach had smaller complication rates and a higher survival rate compared to open resection (>0.05). Though endoscopic resection and open surgical resection have comparable postoperative benefits, preoperative evaluation of cases presenting with sinonasal malignancies is necessary for determining the right treatment method to obtain the best possible results postoperatively.

摘要

本综述的目的是通过比较两种方法的有效性,评估内镜手术和开放手术这两种不同治疗方式在鼻窦恶性肿瘤治疗中的手术效果。利用鼻窦恶性肿瘤、内镜手术、鼻窦恶性肿瘤的开放手术以及内镜手术与开放手术对比等关键词,在多个电子数据库中广泛检索2013年至2018年的英文文章。从文献中筛选出1000篇文章进行筛查。经过全面系统的评估并依据选择标准,本定量分析纳入了10篇文章,共涉及4642例患者。在这4642例患者中,1730例接受了内镜切除术,2912例接受了开放切除术。结果发现,与开放手术切除相比,内镜手术的住院时间更短(<0.05)。开放手术切除的切缘阳性率和复发率均低于内镜切除(>0.05),并且与开放手术相比,内镜手术的并发症发生率更低,生存率更高(>0.05)。尽管内镜切除和开放手术切除术后益处相当,但对于鼻窦恶性肿瘤患者,术前评估对于确定正确的治疗方法以获得最佳术后效果是必要的。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for the management of sinonasal malignancies.内镜手术与开放手术切除治疗鼻窦恶性肿瘤的手术效果
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec 31;46(6):373-378. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.373.
2
Surgical Management Patterns of Sinonasal Malignancy: A Population-Based Study.鼻窦恶性肿瘤的手术治疗模式:一项基于人群的研究。
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Aug;80(4):371-379. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675233. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Endoscopic nasal versus open approach for the management of sinonasal adenocarcinoma: A pooled-analysis of 1826 patients.内镜下鼻腔入路与开放入路治疗鼻窦腺癌:1826例患者的汇总分析
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E2267-74. doi: 10.1002/hed.24182. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
4
Endoscopic Versus Open Resection of Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma Sinonasal Malignancies.内镜与开放手术切除非鳞状细胞鼻窦恶性肿瘤的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Aug;130(8):1872-1876. doi: 10.1002/lary.28270. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
Outcome results of endoscopic vs craniofacial resection of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review and pooled-data analysis.内镜与颅面联合切除术治疗鼻腔鼻窦恶性肿瘤的疗效结果:系统评价和汇总数据分析。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 Jul-Aug;1(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/alr.20051. Epub 2011 May 9.
6
Costs and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Open versus Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Involvement.与累及颅底的鼻窦恶性肿瘤开放手术与内镜手术切除相关的成本及围手术期结局
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Oct;78(5):430-440. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603907. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Outcomes of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜和开放性鼻窦恶性肿瘤切除术的结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S19-S31. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
8
Comparison of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of 652 patients.内镜与开放手术切除鼻窦鳞状细胞癌的比较:652 例患者的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Mar;8(3):421-434. doi: 10.1002/alr.22040. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies in Combination with Radiotherapy.内镜切除术与开放手术治疗局部晚期鼻窦恶性肿瘤联合放疗的长期疗效
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Dec 30;85(1):28-37. doi: 10.1055/a-1980-8567. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Endoscopic and open surgical approaches to locally advanced sinonasal melanoma: comparing the therapeutic benefits.局部晚期鼻窦黑色素瘤的内镜手术与开放手术方法:治疗效果比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Sep;140(9):840-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1321.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging the outcome of a frontal bone tumor facial reconstruction case by a multimodal approach.通过多模态方法利用一例额骨肿瘤面部重建病例的结果。
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2024 Jul 5;11(1):2365174. doi: 10.1080/23320885.2024.2365174. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Treatment Experience of 64 Patients With Esthesioneuroblastoma.64例嗅神经母细胞瘤患者的长期生存结果及治疗经验
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 4;11:624960. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624960. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic Versus Open Resection of Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma Sinonasal Malignancies.内镜与开放手术切除非鳞状细胞鼻窦恶性肿瘤的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Aug;130(8):1872-1876. doi: 10.1002/lary.28270. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Long-term Outcome for Open and Endoscopically Resected Sinonasal Tumors.经内镜与开放性鼻窦肿瘤切除术的长期疗效。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May;160(5):862-869. doi: 10.1177/0194599818815881. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Endoscopic surgery for primary sinonasal malignancies: Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2018 Jun;97(6):E24-E30.
4
Comparison of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of 652 patients.内镜与开放手术切除鼻窦鳞状细胞癌的比较:652 例患者的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Mar;8(3):421-434. doi: 10.1002/alr.22040. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Costs and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Open versus Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Involvement.与累及颅底的鼻窦恶性肿瘤开放手术与内镜手术切除相关的成本及围手术期结局
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Oct;78(5):430-440. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603907. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Survival, Morbidity, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies.鼻窦和颅底腹侧恶性肿瘤的生存、发病率及生活质量结果
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;50(2):467-480. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
An Algorithm for Surgical Approach to the Anterior Skull Base.一种前颅底手术入路的算法
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016 Aug;77(4):364-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580598. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Comparison of endoscopic and external resections for sinonasal instestinal-type adenocarcinoma.鼻窦肠型腺癌的内镜手术与外切除术比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;273(12):4343-4350. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4181-4. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
9
Propensity score analysis of endoscopic and open approaches to malignant paranasal and anterior skull base tumor outcomes.鼻旁窦及前颅底恶性肿瘤内镜手术与开放手术疗效的倾向评分分析
Laryngoscope. 2016 Aug;126(8):1724-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25885. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
10
Surgical approaches to resection of anterior skull base and paranasal sinuses tumors.前颅底和鼻窦肿瘤切除术的外科入路。
Balkan Med J. 2013 Jun;30(2):136-41. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2013.9112. Epub 2013 Jun 1.