University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.040. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
Though point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is recognized as a useful diagnostic and prognostic intervention during cardiac arrest (CA), critics advise caution. The purpose of this survey study was to determine the barriers to POCUS during CA in the Emergency Department (ED).
Two survey instruments were distributed to emergency medicine (EM) attending and resident physicians at three academic centers in the South Florida. The surveys assessed demographics, experience, proficiency, attitudes and barriers. Descriptive and inferential statistics along with Item Response Theory Logistic Model and the Friedman Test with Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to profile responses and rank barriers.
206 EM physicians were invited to participate in the survey, and 187 (91%) responded. 59% of attending physicians and 47% of resident physicians reported that POCUS is performed in all their cases of CA. 5% of attending physicians and 0% of resident physicians reported never performing POCUS during CA. The top-ranked departmental barrier for attending physicians was "No structured curriculum to educate physicians on POCUS." The top-ranked personal barriers were "I do not feel comfortable with my POCUS skills" and "I do not have sufficient time to dedicate to learning POCUS." The top-ranked barriers for resident physicians were "Time to retrieve and operate the machine" and "Chaotic milieu."
While our study demonstrates that most attending and resident physicians utilize POCUS in CA, barriers to high-quality implementation exist. Top attending physician barriers relate to POCUS education, while the top resident physician barriers relate to logistics and the machines. Interventions to overcome these barriers might lead to optimization of POCUS performance during CA in the ED.
尽管床边超声(POCUS)在心脏骤停(CA)期间被认为是一种有用的诊断和预后干预手段,但批评者建议谨慎使用。本调查研究的目的是确定急诊科(ED)CA 期间进行 POCUS 的障碍。
在南佛罗里达州的三个学术中心,向急诊医学(EM)主治医生和住院医生分发了两份调查工具。这些调查评估了人口统计学、经验、熟练程度、态度和障碍。使用描述性和推断性统计以及项目反应理论逻辑模型和弗里德曼检验与 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对响应进行分析和排名障碍。
共邀请了 206 名 EM 医生参与调查,其中 187 名(91%)做出了回应。59%的主治医生和 47%的住院医生报告说,他们在所有 CA 病例中都进行了 POCUS。5%的主治医生和 0%的住院医生报告说,他们在 CA 期间从未进行过 POCUS。主治医生排名最高的部门障碍是“没有针对医生进行 POCUS 教育的结构化课程”。排名最高的个人障碍是“我对自己的 POCUS 技能不自信”和“我没有足够的时间专门学习 POCUS”。住院医生排名最高的障碍是“检索和操作机器的时间”和“混乱的环境”。
尽管我们的研究表明,大多数主治医生和住院医生在 CA 期间使用 POCUS,但高质量实施 POCUS 仍存在障碍。主治医生的主要障碍与 POCUS 教育有关,而住院医生的主要障碍与后勤和机器有关。克服这些障碍的干预措施可能会优化 ED 中 CA 期间的 POCUS 性能。