Suppr超能文献

非植入式骨导听力设备:系统评价。

Non-implantable bone conduction device for hearing loss: a systematic review.

机构信息

Unit of Integrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.

Unit of Otolaryngology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5 Suppl. 3):97-110. Technology in Medicine.

Abstract

There are different treatment options that employ a bone conduction transmission of the sound, for different types of hearing loss, as well as hearing aids, medical intervention via prostheses and surgically implanted medical devices. A middle ear disease causes a decline in the conductive mechanism of hearing. The current possibilities of compensating Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) solutions include both surgical and no surgical Bone Conduction Devices (BCDs). Due to the invasiveness of the implantable devices and their specific requirements in terms of the temporal bone anatomy, non-implantable BCDs are in some cases preferred in the clinical routine. The goal of this review is to investigate the beneficial effects and safety of non-implantable BC devices, analysing the different type of solutions found so far. A systematic review was performed to identify all the clinical studies evaluating the use of non-invasive BCDs. A qualitative analysis based on data extracted was conducted. From 37 articles, 11 prospective studies and 1 retrospective study were selected for a full analysis, for a total of 173 patients from 4- to 77-years-old. Eight of these studies included adult patients, while the other four are paediatric studies. All the studies analyse non-implantable BCDs commonly used in case of CHL, sensorineural HL and single side deafness. Three of them analyse an adhesive device, six compare the adhesive device with a sound processor mounted on a support fitted on the head, one compare it also with an implant, one analyse the sound processor mounted on different type of support, and one compare different type of sound processor. All the studies showed advantages from the use of non-invasive BCDs, both on adults and children. The non-invasive BCDs analysed in this review show good results both from the audiological and subjective point of view and could be considered a safe and effective solution for patients suffering from conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss or single-side deafness. More studies are required to confirm these promising results.

摘要

有不同的治疗选择,采用骨导传输声音,针对不同类型的听力损失,以及助听器、通过假体进行的医疗干预和手术植入的医疗设备。中耳疾病导致听力传导机制下降。目前,补偿传导性听力损失(CHL)的可能性包括手术和非手术骨导设备(BCDs)。由于植入设备的侵入性及其在颞骨解剖方面的特定要求,在某些情况下,非植入式 BCD 在临床常规中更受欢迎。本综述的目的是研究非植入式 BC 设备的有益效果和安全性,分析迄今为止发现的不同类型的解决方案。进行了系统评价,以确定评估非侵入性 BCD 使用的所有临床研究。根据提取的数据进行了定性分析。从 37 篇文章中,选择了 11 项前瞻性研究和 1 项回顾性研究进行全面分析,共有 173 名 4 至 77 岁的患者。其中 8 项研究纳入了成年患者,而另外 4 项是儿科研究。所有研究均分析了常用于 CHL、感音神经性 HL 和单侧耳聋的非植入式 BCD。其中 3 项研究分析了一种粘性装置,6 项研究将粘性装置与安装在头部支撑物上的声音处理器进行比较,1 项研究还将其与植入物进行比较,1 项研究分析了安装在不同类型支撑物上的声音处理器,还有 1 项研究比较了不同类型的声音处理器。所有研究均显示出非侵入性 BCD 的优势,无论是在成人还是儿童中。本综述分析的非侵入性 BCD 在听力和主观方面均取得了良好的效果,可被视为患有传导性听力损失、感音神经性听力损失或单侧耳聋的患者的安全有效的治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来证实这些有前途的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验