Nakamura Yoshiyuki, Zhenjie Zhu, Oya Kazumasa, Tanaka Ryota, Ishitsuka Yosuke, Okiyama Naoko, Watanabe Rei, Fujisawa Yasuhiro
Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 17;10:524700. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.524700. eCollection 2020.
Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating melanoma. However, these previous studies comprised mainly Caucasian populations, in which cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the major clinical type. In contrast, Asian populations have a distinct profile of melanoma and show much higher frequencies of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) and mucosal melanoma (MCM). Compared with CM, ALM and MCM show poorer response to ICIs, but the mechanisms have not been fully understood. To evaluate the immune status in each melanoma subtype, we examined the number of total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD4 TILs, CD8 TILs, and tumor-infiltrating FoxP3 regulatory T cells (Tregs) to evaluate the immune status in each melanoma subtype using data from 137 patients with melanoma. Total TIL numbers in ALM and MCM were significantly lower than that in CM. CD4 TIL number in MCM was also lower than CM although CD4 TIL number in ALM was comparable with CM. In contrast, CD8 TIL numbers in both ALM and MCM were significantly lower than that in CM. Although number of tumor-infiltrating Tregs was comparable among the 3 subtypes, the proportion of tumor-infiltrating Tregs in CD4 T cells in MCM was significantly higher than in CM and ALM. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ALM and MCM were significantly associated with a lower total TIL number, but only MCM was significantly associated with a lower CD4 TIL number. Multivariate regression analysis also revealed that both ALM and MCM were significantly associated with a lower CD8 TIL number. Our results suggest that both ALM and MCM are independent factors of lower total TIL number, which may be associated with poorer responses to ICIs in ALM and MCM.
近期的临床试验已证明免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗黑色素瘤的疗效。然而,这些先前的研究主要纳入白种人群体,其中皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)是主要的临床类型。相比之下,亚洲人群的黑色素瘤情况不同,肢端雀斑样痣黑色素瘤(ALM)和黏膜黑色素瘤(MCM)的发生率要高得多。与CM相比,ALM和MCM对ICI的反应较差,但其机制尚未完全明确。为评估各黑色素瘤亚型的免疫状态,我们利用137例黑色素瘤患者的数据,检测了肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)总数、CD4 TIL、CD8 TIL以及肿瘤浸润性FoxP3调节性T细胞(Treg)数量,以评估各黑色素瘤亚型的免疫状态。ALM和MCM中的TIL总数显著低于CM。MCM中的CD4 TIL数量也低于CM,尽管ALM中的CD4 TIL数量与CM相当。相比之下,ALM和MCM中的CD8 TIL数量均显著低于CM。虽然3种亚型中肿瘤浸润性Treg的数量相当,但MCM中CD4 T细胞里肿瘤浸润性Treg的比例显著高于CM和ALM。多因素回归分析显示,ALM和MCM与较低的TIL总数显著相关,但只有MCM与较低的CD4 TIL数量显著相关。多因素回归分析还显示,ALM和MCM均与较低的CD8 TIL数量显著相关。我们的结果表明,ALM和MCM都是TIL总数较低的独立因素,这可能与ALM和MCM对ICI反应较差有关。