Lustenberger Thomas, Störmann Philipp, Eichler Kathrin, Nau Christoph, Janko Maren, Marzi Ingo
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Front Surg. 2020 Dec 17;7:601140. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.601140. eCollection 2020.
In patients with severe pelvic ring injuries, exsanguination still is the leading cause of death in the early post-injury phase. While mechanical pelvic ring stabilization and pre-peritoneal pelvic packing are mainly addressing venous bleeding, angio-embolization aims to control arterial bleeding. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the rate of postoperative angio-embolization after mechanical pelvic ring injury stabilization and pre-peritoneal pelvic packing. Bleeding sources detected in the angiography and the patient's outcome were investigated. Retrospective observational cohort study at a single academic level I trauma center, reviewing all patients with pelvic ring injuries admitted from 01/2010 to 12/2019. Patients with emergent mechanical pelvic ring stabilization (supraacetabular external fixator and/or pelvic C-clamp) and direct pre-peritoneal pelvic packing were further analyzed. Patients that underwent postoperative angio-embolization were compared with those that did not. All postoperative angio-embolizations were evaluated with regards to bleeding sources and type of embolization. During the study period, a total of 39 patients required immediate mechanical pelvic stabilization and direct pre-peritoneal pelvic packing. Of these, 12 patients (30.8%) underwent a postoperative angio-embolization. The following vessels were identified as bleeding sources: superior gluteal artery ( = 6), obturator artery ( = 2), internal pudendal artery ( = 2), unnamed branches of the internal iliac artery ( = 3). A selective embolization was successful in 11 patients; in 1 patient, an unilateral complete occlusion of the internal iliac artery was performed to control the bleeding. Mean time from hospital admission to the surgical procedure was 52.8 ± 14.7 min and the mean time from admission to angio-embolization was 189.1 ± 55.5 min. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients with angio-embolization was 25.0% ( = 3). Of these, 2 patients died due to multiple organ failure and 1 patient due to severe head injury. Secondary angio-embolization after external pelvic fixation and pre-peritoneal pelvic packing was effective in controlling ongoing bleeding. The most frequently detected bleeding vessel was the superior gluteal artery, which is difficult to surgically address, further highlighting the importance of angio-embolization in the management algorithm.
在严重骨盆环损伤患者中,出血仍是伤后早期死亡的主要原因。虽然机械性骨盆环稳定术和腹膜前骨盆填塞主要针对静脉出血,但血管栓塞术旨在控制动脉出血。本研究的目的是评估机械性骨盆环损伤稳定术和腹膜前骨盆填塞术后血管栓塞术的发生率。研究了血管造影中检测到的出血来源和患者的预后。在一个单一的学术一级创伤中心进行回顾性观察队列研究,回顾2010年1月至2019年12月期间收治的所有骨盆环损伤患者。对接受紧急机械性骨盆环稳定术(髋臼上外固定器和/或骨盆C形夹)和直接腹膜前骨盆填塞的患者进行进一步分析。将接受术后血管栓塞术的患者与未接受该手术的患者进行比较。对所有术后血管栓塞术的出血来源和栓塞类型进行评估。在研究期间,共有39例患者需要立即进行机械性骨盆稳定和直接腹膜前骨盆填塞。其中,12例患者(30.8%)接受了术后血管栓塞术。以下血管被确定为出血来源:臀上动脉(n = 6)、闭孔动脉(n = 2)、阴部内动脉(n = 2)、髂内动脉无名分支(n = 3)。11例患者选择性栓塞成功;1例患者为控制出血对髂内动脉进行了单侧完全闭塞。从入院到手术的平均时间为52.8±14.7分钟,从入院到血管栓塞术的平均时间为189.1±55.5分钟。接受血管栓塞术患者的院内死亡率为25.0%(n = 3)。其中,2例患者死于多器官功能衰竭,1例患者死于重度颅脑损伤。骨盆外固定和腹膜前骨盆填塞术后的二次血管栓塞术在控制持续出血方面有效。最常检测到的出血血管是臀上动脉,该血管手术难以处理,这进一步凸显了血管栓塞术在治疗方案中的重要性。