Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Clin Respir J. 2021 Jun;15(6):622-627. doi: 10.1111/crj.13324. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) with guide sheath (GS) is an effective procedure for diagnosing small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) (≤20 mm in the largest diameter). However, samples obtained using EBUS-TBB with GS are small, and the diagnostic yield of small PPLs biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS is unsatisfactory.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of small PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS compared to that with GS.
Between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015, 276 consecutive lesions were biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS or without GS. We retrospectively compared EBUS-TBB with and without GS in terms of the diagnostic yield and complications related to small PPLs (≤20 mm).
Of the 276 lesions who underwent EBUS-TBB with or without GS, we identified 80 lesions with small PPLs (≤20 mm). Sixty-two lesions were successfully diagnosed by EBUS-TBB (77.5%, diagnostic yield). The diagnostic yield of PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS was not significantly higher than that using EBUS-TBB with GS (34/41 = 82.9% and 28/39 = 71.7%, respectively; p = 0.233). However, according to size (≤15 mm or > 15 mm), location (upper, middle/lingular, or lower area), and structure (solid nodule or ground-glass opacity), the diagnostic yield of small PPLs (≤15 mm) using EBUS-TBB without GS was significantly higher than with GS (21/26 = 80.7% vs. 8/16 = 50.0%, p = 0.036). There were no complications among the two groups.
EBUS-TBB without GS is an effective and safe procedure for diagnosing small PPLs (≤15 mm) compared to that with GS.
经支气管超声引导针吸活检(EBUS-TBB)联合引导鞘(GS)是诊断小周边肺病变(PPL)(最大直径≤20mm)的有效方法。然而,使用 EBUS-TBB 联合 GS 获得的样本较小,且使用 EBUS-TBB 联合 GS 活检小 PPL 的诊断率并不令人满意。
本研究旨在评估与使用 GS 相比,不使用 GS 进行 EBUS-TBB 对小 PPL 的诊断率。
2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日,连续 276 个病灶接受了 EBUS-TBB 联合 GS 或不联合 GS 活检。我们回顾性比较了两种方法在小 PPL(≤20mm)的诊断率和相关并发症方面的差异。
在接受 EBUS-TBB 联合 GS 或不联合 GS 活检的 276 个病灶中,我们确定了 80 个小 PPL(≤20mm)病灶。62 个病灶通过 EBUS-TBB 成功诊断(诊断率为 77.5%)。不使用 GS 的 EBUS-TBB 的 PPL 诊断率并不显著高于使用 GS 的 EBUS-TBB(分别为 34/41=82.9%和 28/39=71.7%;p=0.233)。然而,根据大小(≤15mm 或>15mm)、位置(上、中/舌叶或下区)和结构(实性结节或磨玻璃密度),不使用 GS 的 EBUS-TBB 对小 PPL(≤15mm)的诊断率显著高于使用 GS 的 EBUS-TBB(21/26=80.7%对 8/16=50.0%;p=0.036)。两组均无并发症。
与使用 GS 相比,不使用 GS 的 EBUS-TBB 是一种有效且安全的诊断小 PPL(≤15mm)的方法。