• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险人群慢性脊柱疼痛硬膜外程序的使用减少和通胀调整支出。

Declining Utilization and Inflation-Adjusted Expenditures for Epidural Procedures in Chronic Spinal Pain in the Medicare Population.

机构信息

Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY and Evansville, IN; LSU Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA.

Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-15.

PMID:33400424
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite epidurals being one of the most common interventional pain procedures for managing chronic spinal pain in the United States, expenditure analysis lacks assessment in correlation with utilization patterns.

OBJECTIVES

This investigation was undertaken to assess expenditures for epidural procedures in the fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population from 2009 to 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

The present study was designed to assess expenditures in all settings, for all providers in the FFS Medicare population from 2009 to 2018 in the United States. In this manuscript: • A patient was described as receiving epidural procedures throughout the year.• A visit was considered to include all regions treated during the visit. • An episode was considered as one treatment per region utilizing primary codes only.• Services or procedures were considered as all procedures including bilateral and multiple levels. A standard 5% national sample of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) physician outpatient billing claims data for those enrolled in the FFS Medicare program from 2009 to 2018 was utilized. All the expenditures were presented with allowed costs and adjusted to inflation to 2018 US dollars.

RESULTS

Total expenditures were $723,981,594 in 2009, whereas expenditures of 2018 were $829,987,636, with an overall 14.6% increase, or an annual increase of 1.5%. However, the inflation-adjusted rate was $847,058,465 in 2009, compared to $829,987,636 in 2018, a reduction overall of 2% and an annual reduction of 0.2%. Inflation-adjusted per patient annual costs decreased from $988.93 in 2009 to $819.27 in 2018 with a decrease of 17.2% or an annual decline of 2.1%. In addition, inflation-adjusted costs per procedure decreased from $399.77 to $377.94, or 5.5% overall and 0.6% annually. Per procedure, episode, visit, and patient expenses were higher for transforaminal epidural procedures than lumbar interlaminar/caudal epidural procedures. Overall, costs of transforaminal epidurals increased 27.6% or 2.7% annually, whereas lumbar interlaminar and caudal epidural injections cost were reduced 2.7%, or 0.3% annually. Inflation-adjusted costs for transforaminal epidurals increased 9.1% or 1.0% annually and declined 16.9 or 2.0% annually for lumbar interlaminar and caudal epidural injections.

LIMITATIONS

Expenditures for epidural procedures in chronic spinal pain were assessed only in the FFS Medicare population. This excluded over 30% of the Medicare population, which is enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for inflation, there was a decrease of expenditures for epidural procedures of 2%, or 0.2% annually, from 2009 to 2018. However, prior to inflation, the increases were noted at 14.6% and 1.5%. Inflation-adjusted costs per patient, per visit, and per procedure also declined. The proportion of Medicare patients per 100,000 receiving epidural procedures decreased 9.1%, or 1.1% annually. However, assessment of individual procedures showed higher costs for transforaminal epidural procedures compared to lumbar interlaminar and caudal epidural procedures.

摘要

背景

尽管硬膜外麻醉是美国管理慢性脊柱疼痛最常见的介入性疼痛程序之一,但支出分析缺乏与利用模式相关的评估。

目的

本研究旨在评估 2009 年至 2018 年在医疗保险按服务项目付费(FFS)人群中进行硬膜外程序的支出。

研究设计

本研究旨在评估 2009 年至 2018 年美国 FFS 医疗保险人群中所有提供者在所有环境中的支出。在本手稿中:• 患者被描述为在一年中接受硬膜外程序。• 就诊被认为包括就诊期间治疗的所有区域。• 一个发作被认为是每个区域使用主要代码进行一次治疗。• 服务或程序被认为是包括双侧和多个水平的所有程序。利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)2009 年至 2018 年 FFS 医疗保险计划参与者的全国 5%标准抽样门诊计费数据。所有支出均以允许成本呈现,并根据通胀调整至 2018 年美元。

结果

2009 年总支出为 72398.154 万美元,而 2018 年支出为 829987636 万美元,总体增长 14.6%,或每年增长 1.5%。然而,经通胀调整后的利率为 2009 年的 847058465 美元,而 2018 年为 829987636 美元,总体下降 2%,年降幅为 0.2%。经通胀调整后的每位患者年成本从 2009 年的 988.93 美元降至 2018 年的 819.27 美元,降幅为 17.2%,年降幅为 2.1%。此外,经通胀调整后的每次程序成本从 399.77 美元降至 377.94 美元,或总体下降 5.5%,每年下降 0.6%。每次程序、发作、就诊和患者费用对于经椎间孔硬膜外程序高于腰椎间硬膜外/尾骨硬膜外程序。总体而言,经椎间孔硬膜外程序的成本增加了 27.6%,即每年增加 2.7%,而腰椎间硬膜外和尾骨硬膜外注射的成本减少了 2.7%,即每年减少 0.3%。经通胀调整的经椎间孔硬膜外程序成本每年增加 9.1%,即每年增加 1.0%,而腰椎间硬膜外和尾骨硬膜外注射的成本每年下降 16.9%或每年下降 2.0%。

局限性

仅在 FFS 医疗保险人群中评估了慢性脊柱疼痛的硬膜外程序支出。这排除了 30%以上参加医疗保险优势计划的 Medicare 人群。

结论

经通胀调整后,2009 年至 2018 年硬膜外程序支出下降 2%,即每年下降 0.2%。然而,在通胀之前,增幅为 14.6%和 1.5%。经通胀调整后的每位患者、每次就诊和每次程序的成本也有所下降。每 10 万 Medicare 患者接受硬膜外程序的比例下降了 9.1%,即每年下降 1.1%。然而,对个别程序的评估显示,经椎间孔硬膜外程序的成本高于腰椎间硬膜外和尾骨硬膜外程序。

相似文献

1
Declining Utilization and Inflation-Adjusted Expenditures for Epidural Procedures in Chronic Spinal Pain in the Medicare Population.医疗保险人群慢性脊柱疼痛硬膜外程序的使用减少和通胀调整支出。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-15.
2
Trends of Expenditures and Utilization of Facet Joint Interventions in Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare Population from 2009-2018.2009-2018 年按服务项目付费(FFS)的 Medicare 人群中关节突关节介入治疗的支出和利用趋势。
Pain Physician. 2020 May;23(3S):S129-S147.
3
An Updated Analysis of Utilization of Epidural Procedures in Managing Chronic Pain in the Medicare Population from 2000 to 2018.2000年至2018年医疗保险人群中硬膜外手术治疗慢性疼痛的使用情况最新分析。
Pain Physician. 2020 Mar;23(2):111-126.
4
Utilization and Expenditures of Vertebral Augmentation Continue to Decline: An Analysis in Fee-For-Service (FFS) Recipients from 2009 to 2018.椎体增强术的使用率和支出继续下降:2009 年至 2018 年按服务收费(FFS)受助人的分析。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):401-415.
5
Spinal Cord Stimulation Trends of Utilization and Expenditures in Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare Population from 2009 to 2018.2009 年至 2018 年,按服务项目付费(FFS)的 Medicare 人群中脊髓刺激的利用和支出趋势。
Pain Physician. 2021 Aug;24(5):293-308.
6
Comparative Analysis of Utilization of Epidural Procedures in Managing Chronic Pain in the Medicare Population: Pre and Post Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施前后 Medicare 人群慢性疼痛硬膜外程序使用的对比分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Feb 1;44(3):220-232. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002785.
7
The Influence of COVID-19 on Utilization of Epidural Procedures in Managing Chronic Spinal Pain in the Medicare Population.COVID-19 对医疗保险人群慢性脊柱疼痛管理中硬膜外程序使用的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Jul 1;48(13):950-961. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004574. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
Epidural Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines.硬膜外介入治疗慢性脊柱疼痛管理:美国介入疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)综合循证指南。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(S1):S27-S208.
9
Assessment of the growth of epidural injections in the medicare population from 2000 to 2011.评估 2000 年至 2011 年医疗保险人群硬膜外注射的增长情况。
Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):E349-64.
10
Utilization of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain In Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: An Analysis of Patterns of Utilization.2000年至2014年医疗保险人群中慢性疼痛管理的介入技术应用:利用模式分析
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):E531-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Caudal Epidural Method to Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforamen Block in Patient's Lumbar Discectomy with Failed Back Syndrome Symptoms: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial.尾侧硬膜外法与超声引导下S1经椎间孔阻滞在患有腰椎间盘切除术后失败综合征症状患者中的比较评估:一项双盲临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(6):e137325. doi: 10.5812/aapm-137325. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Comparison of international medical costs for interventional pain treatment: a focus on Korea and Japan.介入性疼痛治疗的国际医疗成本比较:以韩国和日本为重点。
Korean J Pain. 2024 Jan 1;37(1):51-58. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23254. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization Patterns of Facet Joint Interventions in Managing Spinal Pain in a Medicare Population.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行对医疗保险人群脊柱疼痛管理中关节突关节干预使用模式的影响。
Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):505-527. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00476-3. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Prognostic factors associated with outcome following an epidural steroid injection for disc-related sciatica: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.与椎间盘源性坐骨神经痛硬膜外类固醇注射后结局相关的预后因素:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):1029-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07528-4. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
5
Efficacy of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.射频神经切断术治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 10;14:2859-2891. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S323362. eCollection 2021.
6
The role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮神经松解术在腰椎间盘突出症中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Korean J Pain. 2021 Jul 1;34(3):346-368. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.346.