Suppr超能文献

黎巴嫩一家精神病紧急医院的快速镇静:TREC-Lebanon - 肌肉注射氟哌啶醇和异丙嗪与肌肉注射氟哌啶醇、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪的实用随机对照试验。

Rapid tranquillisation in a psychiatric emergency hospital in Lebanon: TREC-Lebanon - a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular haloperidol and promethazine intramuscular haloperidol, promethazine and chlorpromazine.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 1NU, UK.

Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Deir Salib, Jal l Dib, Lebanon.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2751-2759. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004869. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agitated patients constitute 10% of all emergency psychiatric treatment. Management guidelines, the preferred treatment of clinicians differ in opinion and practice. In Lebanon, the use of the triple therapy haloperidol plus promethazine plus chlorpromazine (HPC) is frequently used but no studies involving this combination exists.

METHOD

A pragmatic randomised open trial (September 2018-July 2019) in the Lebanese Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross in Beirut Lebanon involving 100 people requiring urgent intramuscular sedation due to aggressive behaviour were given intramuscular chlorpromazine 100 mg plus haloperidol 5 mg plus promethazine 25 mg (HPC) or intramuscular haloperidol 5 mg plus promethazine 25 mg.

RESULTS

Primary outcome data were available for 94 (94%) people. People allocated to the haloperidol plus promethazine (HP) group showed no clear difference at 20 min compared with patients allocated to the HPC group [relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.50].

CONCLUSIONS

Neither intervention consistently impacted the outcome of 'calm', or 'asleep' and had no discernible effect on the use of restraints, use of additional drugs or recurrence. If clinicians are faced with uncertainty on which of the two intervention combinations to use, the simpler HP is much more widely tested and the addition of chlorpromazine adds no clear benefit with a risk of additional adverse effects.

摘要

背景

激越患者占所有急诊精神科治疗的 10%。管理指南和临床医生的首选治疗存在分歧。在黎巴嫩,经常使用三药联合疗法(氟哌啶醇加异丙嗪加氯丙嗪,HPC),但尚无涉及该联合用药的研究。

方法

这是一项在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的十字会黎巴嫩精神病院进行的实用随机开放试验(2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 7 月),涉及 100 名因攻击性行为需要紧急肌肉镇静的人,他们接受肌肉注射氯丙嗪 100mg 加氟哌啶醇 5mg 加异丙嗪 25mg(HPC)或肌肉注射氟哌啶醇 5mg 加异丙嗪 25mg。

结果

94 人(94%)有主要结局数据。与 HPC 组相比,接受氟哌啶醇加异丙嗪(HP)组的人在 20 分钟时没有明显差异[相对风险(RR)0.84,95%置信区间(CI)0.47-1.50]。

结论

两种干预措施都没有一致地影响“安静”或“入睡”的结果,也没有对约束的使用、额外药物的使用或复发产生明显影响。如果临床医生对使用这两种干预组合中的哪一种存在不确定性,那么更简单的 HP 则经过了更广泛的测试,而添加氯丙嗪并没有明显的益处,反而可能会增加不良反应的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验