Suppr超能文献

极高危动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中心收缩压高于外周血压的特征及影响。

Features and implications of higher systolic central than peripheral blood pressure in patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Daegu Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2021 Nov;35(11):994-1002. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-00472-6. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Abstract

Peripheral blood pressure (PBP) is usually higher than central blood pressure (CBP) due to pulse amplification; however, it is not well understood why cuff-measured PBP can be lower than CBP estimated by the late systolic pressure of radial pulse waves. We explored the implications of systolic PBP-CBP (P-CBP) differences for cardiovascular (CV) prognosis. In total, 335 patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) underwent automated applanation tonometry and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and they were classified into groups according to positive or negative systolic P-CBP differences. Between-group characteristics and clinical outcomes (the composite of coronary revascularization, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and CV death) were evaluated. Patients with negative differences had significantly higher frequency of hypertension, coronary artery disease, higher ASCVD risk burden, and elevated N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide. They had higher left atrial volume index (LAVI) and lower systolic mitral septal tissue velocity (TVI-s') than those with a positive difference. These patients showed higher systolic PBP and CBP, and a higher baPWV. Multivariable analysis indicated that TVI-s', LAVI, and ASCVD risk burden were independent determinants of such systolic P-CBP differences. During a median follow-up of 12.6 months, clinical outcomes were significantly related to a negative difference (11.5% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.014), and a systolic P-CBP difference ≤ -8 mmHg was associated with a threefold higher likelihood of poor prognosis. In patients at very high risk of ASCVD, systolic P-CBP difference was associated with cardiac dysfunction and ASCVD risk burden, allowing further risk stratification.

摘要

外周血压(PBP)通常高于中心血压(CBP),这是由于脉搏放大所致;然而,人们并不清楚为什么袖带测量的 PBP 可能低于桡动脉脉搏波收缩期后期压力估计的 CBP。我们探讨了收缩压 PBP-CBP(P-CBP)差值对心血管(CV)预后的影响。共有 335 例有极高动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的患者接受了自动平板血压测量和肱踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)检查,并根据收缩压 P-CBP 差值的正负将其分类。评估了组间特征和临床结局(包括冠状动脉血运重建、卒中和心力衰竭住院以及 CV 死亡的复合终点)。差异为负的患者高血压和冠心病的频率明显更高,ASCVD 风险负担更高,N 末端 pro B 型利钠肽也更高。与差异为正的患者相比,他们的左心房容积指数(LAVI)更高,二尖瓣间隔组织速度(TVI-s')更低。这些患者的收缩压 PBP 和 CBP 更高,baPWV 也更高。多变量分析表明,TVI-s'、LAVI 和 ASCVD 风险负担是这种收缩压 P-CBP 差异的独立决定因素。在中位随访 12.6 个月期间,临床结局与负差值显著相关(11.5% vs. 3.4%,p=0.014),收缩压 P-CBP 差值≤-8mmHg 与预后不良的可能性增加三倍相关。在 ASCVD 风险极高的患者中,收缩压 P-CBP 差值与心脏功能障碍和 ASCVD 风险负担相关,可进一步进行风险分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验