National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021 Aug;14(4):595-597. doi: 10.1007/s12265-020-10088-3. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Provisional stenting is considered the gold standard approach for most bifurcation lesions, but the benefit of routine side branch (SB) strut dilatation has not been fully elucidated. A benchtop model was used to determine the benefits of routine side branch (SB) dilatation techniques on strut apposition, acute thrombogenicity, and flow disruption. Three different provisional bifurcation techniques were compared: no SB dilatation "keep it open" method (KIO), sequential balloon dilatation (SBD), and kissing balloon inflation (KBI). Stents were deployed in a silicon bifurcation model and perfused with blood at a flow rate of 200 ml/min for 60 min. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) pullbacks were obtained before and after flow perfusion to conduct strut analysis and acute thrombus measurement respectively. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were created using OCT pullbacks and simulated based on experimental conditions to analyze flow disruption. The strut analysis showed that KBI had the lowest percentage of floating (10.6 ± 2.3%) (p = 0.0004) and malapposed (41.2 ± 8.5%) struts (p = 0.59), followed by SBD and then KIO. This correlated to KBI having the lowest amount of thrombus formed at the SB, followed by SBD, with KIO being the most thrombogenic (KBI: 0.84 ± 0.22mm, SBD: 1.17 ± 0.25mm, KIO: 1.31 ± 0.36mm, p = 0.18). CFD models also predicted a similar trend, with KBI having the lowest amount of area of high shear rate as well as flow recirculation. Based on this benchtop model, SB intervention strategies demonstrated a reduction in number of struts and resulting thrombogenicity at the bifurcation ostia. Graphical abstract.
在大多数分叉病变中,临时支架置入被认为是金标准方法,但常规边支(SB)支架扩张的益处尚未完全阐明。本研究使用台式模型来确定常规边支(SB)扩张技术对支架贴壁、急性血栓形成和血流中断的益处。比较了三种不同的临时分叉技术:不扩张边支的“保持开放”方法(KIO)、序贯球囊扩张(SBD)和对吻球囊扩张(KBI)。支架在硅分叉模型中展开,并以 200ml/min 的流速灌注血液 60min。在血流灌注前后进行光学相干断层扫描(OCT)拉回,分别进行支架分析和急性血栓测量。使用 OCT 拉回创建计算流体动力学(CFD)模型,并根据实验条件进行模拟,以分析血流中断。支架分析表明,KBI 的漂浮(10.6 ± 2.3%)(p = 0.0004)和贴壁不良(41.2 ± 8.5%)支架比例最低(p = 0.59),其次是 SBD,然后是 KIO。这与 KBI 在边支形成的血栓量最低相关,其次是 SBD,而 KIO 的血栓形成性最高(KBI:0.84 ± 0.22mm,SBD:1.17 ± 0.25mm,KIO:1.31 ± 0.36mm,p = 0.18)。CFD 模型也预测了类似的趋势,KBI 的高剪切率区域和血流再循环的面积最小。基于该台式模型,边支干预策略显示分叉口处的支架数量减少,血栓形成性降低。