Castelló R, Alegría E, Merino A, Soria F, Martínez-Caro D
Dpt. Cardiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Angiology. 1988 Jan;39(1 Pt 1):8-15. doi: 10.1177/000331978803900102.
To define the clinical and angiographic features of the syndrome of spasm of angiographically normal coronary arteries, 77 patients with spasm and fixed angiographically normal coronary arteries, 77 patients with spasm and fixed coronary stenosis equal to or greater than 50% (group A) were compared with 35 patients with spasm and normal or minimally diseased coronary arteries (group B). Statistically significant differences between groups A and B were as follows: the incidence of rest angina (50.6% vs 85.7%; p less than 0.01) and mixed angina (32.5% vs 5.7%; p less than 0.01); the appearance of ST segment depression (53.3% vs 16%; p less than 0.01) and no electrocardiographic changes during stress test (35.6% vs 76%; p less than 0.01); and the tendency for arteriographically documented spasm to be focal (87.5% vs 71.4%; p less than 0.05) and to affect only one vessel (76.6% vs 57.1%; p less than 0.05). No differences were found between groups A and B in major coronary risk factors, history of previous myocardial infarction, electrocardiographic abnormalities at rest or during pain episodes, or arteries affected by spasm. Thus, angina appearing exclusively at rest is the main clinical feature of spasm of normal coronary arteries. The electrocardiogram, whether at rest or during pain episodes, has no value for predicting the existence of underlying coronary lesions, whereas stress testing does. Spasm of normal arteries tends to be more diffuse than that superimposed on organic lesions and to affect more than one artery, suggesting different mechanisms in the genesis of both types of spasm.
为明确冠状动脉造影正常的冠状动脉痉挛综合征的临床和血管造影特征,将77例有痉挛且冠状动脉造影固定正常的患者、77例有痉挛且冠状动脉固定狭窄等于或大于50%的患者(A组)与35例有痉挛且冠状动脉正常或病变轻微的患者(B组)进行比较。A组和B组之间的统计学显著差异如下:静息性心绞痛发生率(50.6%对85.7%;p<0.01)和混合性心绞痛发生率(32.5%对5.7%;p<0.01);ST段压低的出现(53.3%对16%;p<0.01)以及运动试验期间无心电图改变(35.6%对76%;p<0.01);血管造影记录的痉挛倾向于局灶性(87.5%对71.4%;p<0.05)且仅累及一支血管(76.6%对57.1%;p<0.05)。A组和B组在主要冠状动脉危险因素、既往心肌梗死病史、静息时或疼痛发作时的心电图异常或受痉挛影响的动脉方面未发现差异。因此,仅在静息时出现的心绞痛是正常冠状动脉痉挛的主要临床特征。心电图,无论是在静息时还是疼痛发作时,对于预测潜在冠状动脉病变的存在均无价值,而运动试验则有价值。正常动脉的痉挛往往比叠加在器质性病变上的痉挛更弥漫,且累及一支以上动脉,提示两种类型痉挛的发生机制不同。