Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 May-Jun;11(3):e301-e307. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Previous studies have proposed 2 different contouring guidelines for the prophylactic radiation of para-aortic lymph nodes (PANs) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Because PAN-mapping atlases in current literature are limited to small patient samples and nodal populations, we updated the PAN atlas with a large data set of positron emission tomography (PET)-positive PANs on PET/computed tomography (CT) from patients with cervical cancer.
We identified 176 PET-positive PANs on pretreatment PET/CT of 47 patients with diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA cervical cancer. PANs were classified as left-lateral para-aortic (LPA), aortocaval (AC), or right paracaval (RPC). PAN clinical target volume (CTV) contours were drawn for all patients based on previously published guidelines by Takiar (CTV-T) and Keenan (CTV-K) and nodal volumetric coverage was assessed.
We identified 94 LPA nodes (54%), 71 AC nodes (40%), and 11 (6%) RPC nodes. CTV-T had improved nodal center coverage of 97.6% compared with 85.0% for CTV-K (P < .001). Nodal center coverage for CTV-K and CTV-T (with corresponding PAN) were 79 (84.0%) and 93 (99.0%) LPA nodes (P = .001), 64 (90.1%) and 68 (95.8%) AC nodes (P = .221), and 5 (45.5%) and 9 (81.8%) RPC nodes (P = .134), respectively. Additionally, our updated PAN atlas identified nodal centers anterior to the aorta and inferior vena cava that are not covered by CTV-T but covered by CTV-K due to the 10 mm anterior aortic expansion of CTV-K.
We have updated the PAN anatomic map of 176 PET-positive nodes from 47 patients and demonstrated that CTV-T has significantly better PAN coverage over CTV-K for posterior LPA and retrocaval regions for our data set. Additionally, we suggest a modification that includes a blend of CTV-T and CTV-K to provide optimal coverage for the mapped nodes anterior to the great vessels in our data set.
先前的研究针对局部晚期宫颈癌预防性放射治疗腹主动脉旁淋巴结(PANs)提出了 2 种不同的勾画指南。由于当前文献中的 PAN 图谱仅限于小患者样本和淋巴结人群,我们使用来自宫颈癌患者的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)上的大量 PET 阳性 PAN 数据集对 PAN 图谱进行了更新。
我们从 47 名国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期为 IB 至 IVA 期的宫颈癌患者的预处理 PET/CT 中确定了 176 个 PET 阳性 PAN。将 PAN 分为左侧旁主动脉(LPA)、主动脉旁(AC)或右旁腔静脉(RPC)。根据 Takiar(CTV-T)和 Keenan(CTV-K)先前发表的指南,为所有患者绘制了 PAN 临床靶区(CTV)轮廓,并评估了淋巴结的体积覆盖率。
我们确定了 94 个 LPA 节点(54%)、71 个 AC 节点(40%)和 11 个 RPC 节点(6%)。CTV-T 较 CTV-K(85.0%)显著提高了淋巴结中心的覆盖率(97.6%)(P<0.001)。CTV-K 和 CTV-T(相应的 PAN)的淋巴结中心覆盖率分别为 93(99.0%)和 79(84.0%)LPA 节点(P=0.001)、68(95.8%)和 64(90.1%)AC 节点(P=0.221)和 9(81.8%)和 5(45.5%)RPC 节点(P=0.134)。此外,我们的更新后的 PAN 图谱还确定了主动脉和下腔静脉前方未被 CTV-T 覆盖但被 CTV-K 覆盖的淋巴结中心,这是由于 CTV-K 在前主动脉扩张 10mm。
我们更新了来自 47 名患者的 176 个 PET 阳性节点的 PAN 解剖图谱,并证明对于我们的数据集,CTV-T 在 LPA 后区和 retroacaval 区的 PAN 覆盖范围明显优于 CTV-K。此外,我们建议进行一项修改,将 CTV-T 和 CTV-K 相结合,以提供我们数据集内大血管前方映射节点的最佳覆盖范围。