Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Research Institute, 333 Bostwick Ave. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021 Jan 13;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13072-020-00380-6.
Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors are the clinical hallmark of Neurofibromatosis Type 1. They account for substantial morbidity and mortality in NF1. Cutaneous (CNF) and plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) share nearly identical histology, but maintain different growth rates and risk of malignant conversion. The reasons for this disparate clinical behavior are not well explained by recent genome or transcriptome profiling studies. We hypothesized that CNFs and PNFs are epigenetically distinct tumor types that exhibit differential signaling due to genome-wide and site-specific methylation events. We interrogated the methylation profiles of 45 CNFs and 17 PNFs from NF1 subjects with the Illumina EPIC 850K methylation array. Based on these profiles, we confirm that CNFs and PNFs are epigenetically distinct tumors with broad differences in higher-order chromatin states and specific methylation events altering genes involved in key biological and cellular processes, such as inflammation, RAS/MAPK signaling, actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, and oxytocin signaling. Based on our identification of two separate DMRs associated with alternative leading exons in MAP2K3, we demonstrate differential RAS/MKK3/p38 signaling between CNFs and PNFs. Epigenetic reinforcement of RAS/MKK/p38 was a defining characteristic of CNFs leading to pro-inflammatory signaling and chromatin conformational changes, whereas PNFs signaled predominantly through RAS/MEK. Tumor size also correlated with specific CpG methylation events. Taken together, these findings confirm that NF1 deficiency influences the epigenetic regulation of RAS signaling fates, accounting for observed differences in CNF and PNF clinical behavior. The extension of these findings is that CNFs may respond differently than PNFs to RAS-targeted therapeutics raising the possibility of targeting p38-mediated inflammation for CNF treatment.
良性周围神经鞘瘤是神经纤维瘤病 1 型的临床特征。它们在 NF1 中导致相当大的发病率和死亡率。皮肤神经鞘瘤 (CNF) 和丛状神经鞘瘤 (PNF) 具有几乎相同的组织学,但保持不同的生长速度和恶性转化的风险。最近的基因组或转录组分析研究并没有很好地解释这种不同的临床行为的原因。我们假设 CNF 和 PNF 是表观遗传不同的肿瘤类型,由于全基因组和特定部位的甲基化事件,表现出不同的信号。我们用 Illumina EPIC 850K 甲基化阵列分析了 45 例 NF1 患者的 CNF 和 17 例 PNF 的甲基化谱。基于这些图谱,我们证实 CNF 和 PNF 是表观遗传不同的肿瘤,在高级染色质状态和特定的甲基化事件方面存在广泛差异,这些事件改变了参与关键生物学和细胞过程的基因,如炎症、RAS/MAPK 信号、肌动蛋白细胞骨架重排和催产素信号。基于我们鉴定出与 MAP2K3 替代前导外显子相关的两个分离的 DMR,我们证明了 CNF 和 PNF 之间存在不同的 RAS/MKK3/p38 信号。RAS/MKK/p38 的表观遗传强化是 CNF 的一个特征,导致促炎信号和染色质构象变化,而 PNF 主要通过 RAS/MEK 信号。肿瘤大小也与特定的 CpG 甲基化事件相关。总之,这些发现证实 NF1 缺陷影响 RAS 信号命运的表观遗传调控,解释了 CNF 和 PNF 临床行为的差异。这些发现的延伸是,CNF 可能对 RAS 靶向治疗的反应不同于 PNF,这为针对 CNF 治疗的 p38 介导的炎症提供了可能性。