National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Diabetes Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001787.
Given an increasing use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the real-world setting, we conducted a prospective observational study (Japan-based Clinical Research Network for Diabetes Registry: J-BRAND Registry) to elucidate the safety and efficacy profile of long-term usage of alogliptin.
We registered 5969 patients from April 2012 through September 2014, who started receiving alogliptin (group A) or other classes of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs; group B), and were followed for 3 years at 239 sites nationwide. Safety was the primary outcome. Symptomatic hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, skin disorders of non-extrinsic origin, severe infections, and cancer were collected as major adverse events (AEs). Efficacy assessment was the secondary outcome and included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin and urinary albumin.
Of the registered, 5150 (group A: 3395 and group B: 1755) and 5096 (3358 and 1738) were included for safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. Group A patients mostly (>90%) continued to use alogliptin. In group B, biguanides were the primary agents, while DPP-4 inhibitors were added in up to ~36% of patients. The overall incidence of AEs was similar between the two groups (42.7% vs 42.2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the incidence of cancer was significantly higher in group A than in group B (7.4% vs 4.8%, p=0.040), while no significant incidence difference was observed in the individual cancer. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the imbalanced patient distribution (more elderly patients in group A than in group B), but not alogliptin usage per se, contributed to cancer development. The incidence of other major AE categories was with no between-group difference. Between-group difference was not detected, either, in the incidence of microvascular and macrovascular complications. HbA1c and fasting glucose decreased significantly at the 0.5-year visit and nearly plateaued thereafter in both groups.
Alogliptin as a representative of DPP-4 inhibitors was safe and durably efficacious when used alone or with other OHAs for patients with type 2 diabetes in the real world setting.
鉴于二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂在现实世界中用于治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的使用日益增多,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究(日本临床研究网络糖尿病登记处:J-BRAND 登记处),以阐明阿格列汀长期使用的安全性和疗效概况。
我们于 2012 年 4 月至 2014 年 9 月期间登记了 5969 名开始接受阿格列汀(A 组)或其他类别口服降糖药(OHA;B 组)的患者,并在全国 239 个地点进行了为期 3 年的随访。安全性为主要结局。收集症状性低血糖、胰腺炎、非外源性来源的皮肤疾病、严重感染和癌症作为主要不良事件(AE)。疗效评估为次要结局,包括血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素和尿白蛋白的变化。
在登记的患者中,有 5150 名(A 组:3395 名,B 组:1755 名)和 5096 名(A 组:3358 名,B 组:1738 名)分别纳入安全性和疗效分析。A 组患者大多(>90%)继续使用阿格列汀。在 B 组中,二甲双胍是主要药物,而在多达~36%的患者中添加了 DPP-4 抑制剂。两组的总体 AE 发生率相似(42.7% vs 42.2%)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,A 组癌症的发生率明显高于 B 组(7.4% vs 4.8%,p=0.040),而单个癌症的发生率无显著差异。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,癌症的发生与患者分布不均(A 组比 B 组老年人更多)有关,而不是阿格列汀的使用本身。两组之间其他主要 AE 类别的发生率没有差异。两组之间微血管和大血管并发症的发生率也没有差异。两组患者的 HbA1c 和空腹血糖在 0.5 年就诊时显著下降,此后几乎趋于稳定。
在现实世界环境中,阿格列汀作为 DPP-4 抑制剂的代表,单独使用或与其他 OHA 联合使用时,对 2 型糖尿病患者是安全且持久有效的。