Rivera Pavon Mavi Maureen, Shahi Anoj, Akuna Emmanuel, Asemota Iriagbonse Rotimi, Arif Abdul Wahab, Torres Andrea, Elbermawy Mahmoud, Velazquez Genaro, Almani Muhammad Usman, Usman Muhammad, Quelal Karol, Bashir Mohammad Waqas, Ojemolon Pius Ehiremen, Eseaton Precious Obehi
Internal Medicine, John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Internal Medicine, John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
J Investig Med. 2021 Jan 13. doi: 10.1136/jim-2020-001707.
This study compares outcomes of patients admitted for atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AF as principal diagnosis with and without SLE as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. 821,630 hospitalizations were for adult patients, who had a principal diagnosis of AF, out of which, 2645 (0.3%) had SLE as secondary diagnosis. Hospitalizations for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality (1.5% vs 0.91%, adjusted OR (AOR): 1.0, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.14, p=0.991), LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days, p=0.525), total hospital charges ($51,351 vs $39,121, p=0.056), odds of undergoing pharmacologic cardioversion (0.38% vs 0.38%, AOR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.69, p=0.880) and electrical cardioversion (12.9% vs 17.5%, AOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.15, p=0.324) compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had increased odds of undergoing ablation (6.8% vs 4.2%, AOR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.7, p<0.0001). Patients admitted for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing pharmacologic and electrical cardioversion compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had greater odds of undergoing ablation.
本研究比较了合并和未合并系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的房颤(AF)住院患者的结局。主要结局是住院死亡率。住院时间(LOS)、总住院费用、接受消融、药物复律和电复律的几率是感兴趣的次要结局。数据从2016年和2017年国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中提取。使用国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版代码,在NIS中搜索以AF为主要诊断且以SLE为次要诊断和不以SLE为次要诊断的成人住院病例。相应地使用多因素逻辑回归和线性回归分析来调整混杂因素。2016年和2017年合并的NIS数据库中包含超过7100万份出院记录。821,630例住院病例为成人患者,其主要诊断为AF,其中2645例(0.3%)以SLE为次要诊断。合并SLE的AF住院患者与未合并SLE的患者相比,住院死亡率相似(1.5%对0.91%,调整后比值比(AOR):1.0,95%置信区间0.47至2.14,p = 0.991)、住院时间相似(4.2天对3.4天,p = 0.525)、总住院费用相似(51,351美元对39,121美元,p = 0.056)、接受药物复律的几率相似(0.38%对0.38%,AOR:0.90,95%置信区间0.22至3.69,p = 0.880)以及接受电复律的几率相似(12.9%对17.5%,AOR 0.87,95%置信区间0.66至1.15,p = 0.324)。然而,SLE组接受消融的几率增加(6.8%对4.2%,AOR:1.9,95%置信区间1.3至2.7,p<0.0001)。合并SLE的AF住院患者与未合并SLE的患者相比,住院死亡率、住院时间、总住院费用、接受药物复律和电复律的可能性相似。然而,SLE组接受消融的几率更高。