Suppr超能文献

定量双能 CT 的扫描间和扫描仪间差异:三种不同扫描仪类型的评估。

Inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of quantitative dual-energy CT: evaluation with three different scanner types.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4438-4451. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07611-0. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of iodine concentration (IC) and attenuation in virtual monoenergetic images at 65 keV (HU) in patients with repeated abdominal examinations on dual-source (dsDECT), rapid kV switching (rsDECT), and dual-layer detector DECT (dlDECT).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 131 patients who underwent two abdominal DECT examinations on the same scanner (dsDECT: n = 46, rsDECT: n = 45, dlDECT: n = 40). IC and HU were measured by placing regions of interest in the liver, spleen, kidneys, aorta, portal vein, and inferior vena cava. Overall IC and HU for each scanner, their inter-scan differences and proportional variation were calculated and compared between scanner types.

RESULTS

The three scanner-specific cohorts showed similar weight, body diameter, age, sex, and contrast media injection parameters as well as inter-scan differences hereof (p range: 0.23-0.99). Absolute inter-scan differences of HU and IC were comparable between scanners (p range: 0.08-1.0). Overall inter-scan variation was significantly higher in IC than HU (p < 0.05). For the liver, rsDECT showed significantly lower inter-scan variation of IC compared to dsDECT/dlDECT (p = 0.005/0.01), while for the spleen, this difference was only significant compared to dsDECT (p = 0.015). Normalizing IC of the liver to the portal vein and of the spleen to the aorta did not significantly reduce inter-scan variation (p = 0.97 and 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine measurements across different DECT scanners show inter-scan variation which is higher compared to variation of attenuation values. Inter-scanner differences in longitudinal variation and overall iodine concentration depend on the scanner pairs and organs assessed and should be acknowledged in clinical and scientific DECT applications.

KEY POINTS

• All scanner types showed comparable inter-scan variation of attenuation, while for iodine, the rapid kV switching DECT showed lower variability in the liver and spleen. • Iodine concentration showed higher inter-scan variation than attenuation measurements; normalization to vessels did not significantly improve inter-scan reproducibility of iodine concentration in parenchymal organs. • Differences between the three scanner types regarding overall iodine concentration and attenuation obtained from both timepoints were within the range of average intra-patient, inter-scan differences for most assessed organs and vessels.

摘要

目的

研究在重复腹部双源(dsDECT)、快速千伏切换(rsDECT)和双层探测器 DECT(dlDECT)上对患者进行检查时,65keV(HU)下虚拟单能量图像中碘浓度(IC)和衰减的扫描间和扫描仪间变化。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了 131 名在同一台扫描仪上进行两次腹部 DECT 检查的患者(dsDECT:n=46,rsDECT:n=45,dlDECT:n=40)。通过在肝脏、脾脏、肾脏、主动脉、门静脉和下腔静脉中放置感兴趣区来测量 IC 和 HU。计算并比较了每个扫描仪的总体 IC 和 HU、它们的扫描间差异和比例变化,并比较了扫描仪类型之间的差异。

结果

三个具有扫描仪特异性的队列在体重、体径、年龄、性别和对比剂注射参数以及扫描间差异方面表现出相似性(p 范围:0.23-0.99)。扫描仪之间的 HU 和 IC 的绝对扫描间差异具有可比性(p 范围:0.08-1.0)。IC 的总体扫描间变化明显高于 HU(p<0.05)。对于肝脏,rsDECT 与 dsDECT/dlDECT 相比,IC 的扫描间变化明显更低(p=0.005/0.01),而对于脾脏,与 dsDECT 相比,差异仅具有统计学意义(p=0.015)。将肝脏的 IC 归一化到门静脉和脾脏的 IC 归一到主动脉并没有显著降低扫描间变化(p=0.97 和 0.50)。

结论

不同 DECT 扫描仪的碘测量值显示出与衰减值变化相比,扫描间变化更高。纵向变化和总体碘浓度的扫描仪间差异取决于所评估的扫描仪对和器官,并应在临床和科学的 DECT 应用中得到承认。

关键点

  1. 所有扫描仪类型的衰减扫描间变化具有可比性,而对于碘,快速千伏切换 DECT 显示出肝脏和脾脏的变异性更低。

  2. 碘浓度的扫描间变化高于衰减测量值;将其归一化为血管并不能显著提高实质器官碘浓度的扫描间可重复性。

  3. 三种扫描仪类型在大多数评估器官和血管上,从两个时间点获得的总体碘浓度和衰减之间的差异均在大多数患者的平均扫描间差异范围内。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验