Ramsey David J, Poulin Samuel J, LaMonica Lauren C, Blaha Gregory R, Barouch Fina C, Chang Jeffrey, Marx Jeffrey L
Division of Ophthalmology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Peabody, MA 01960, USA.
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 8;15:31-39. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S286665. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the functional and anatomic outcomes, as well as cost-effectiveness, of the timing of conversion to intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) in patients with treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME).
Thirty consecutive eyes (25 patients) were identified that were treated with ≥3 intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and/or ranibizumab (IVR) injections prior to treatment with ≥3 IVA injections. Eyes that received ≤6 IVB and/or IVR injections (early-switch) were compared to those that received ≥7 injections (late-switch) prior to conversion to IVA. Treatment effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A micro-simulation model examined the impact of treatment duration on outcomes.
Early- (n=18) and late- (n=12) switch eyes had similar vision prior to conversion to IVA. Despite improvements in retinal thickness, only the early-switch eyes maintained vision gains after conversion to IVA through the end of follow-up (=0.027). Early switch saved $22,884/eye and produced an additional 0.027 QALYs.
Early conversion to IVA optimizes vision outcomes and results in lower overall treatment expenditures.
评估治疗抵抗性糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者转换为玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVA)的时机对功能和解剖学结果以及成本效益的影响。
确定连续30只眼(25例患者),这些眼在接受≥3次玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVA)治疗之前接受了≥3次玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(IVB)和/或雷珠单抗(IVR)。将接受≤6次IVB和/或IVR注射(早期转换)的眼与在转换为IVA之前接受≥7次注射(晚期转换)的眼进行比较。治疗效果以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量。一个微观模拟模型研究了治疗持续时间对结果的影响。
早期转换组(n = 18)和晚期转换组(n = 12)的眼在转换为IVA之前视力相似。尽管视网膜厚度有所改善,但只有早期转换组的眼在转换为IVA后直至随访结束时仍保持视力提高(P = 0.027)。早期转换每只眼节省22,884美元,并产生额外的0.027个QALY。
早期转换为IVA可优化视力结果并降低总体治疗费用。