Schmuckler Mark A
Division of Life Sciences University of Toronto at Scarborough.
Infancy. 2001 Oct;2(4):419-436. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02. Epub 2001 Oct 1.
Ecological validity has typically been taken to refer to whether or not one can generalize from observed behavior in the laboratory to natural behavior in the world. Although common in current discussions of research, the idea of ecological validity has a long history in psychological thought. A brief historical examination of this idea reveals that concerns with ecological validity are evident in multiple dimensions of experimental work, including the nature of the experimental setting, the stimuli under investigation, and the observer's response employed as the measure. One problem with this multidimensionality, however, is that no explicit criteria have been offered for applying this concept to an evaluation of research. One consequence of this problem is that concerns with ecological validity can be raised in most experimental situations. This article includes a discussion of some demands of ecological validity and the nature of these different dimensions, as well as a critical evaluation of research on the development of mobility with respect to these constraints.
生态效度通常被认为是指能否从实验室中观察到的行为推广至现实世界中的自然行为。尽管生态效度这一概念在当前的研究讨论中很常见,但它在心理学思想中有着悠久的历史。对这一概念进行简要的历史考察可以发现,对生态效度的关注在实验工作的多个维度中都很明显,包括实验环境的性质、所研究的刺激以及作为测量手段的观察者反应。然而,这种多维度性存在一个问题,即没有提供将这一概念应用于研究评估的明确标准。这个问题的一个后果是,在大多数实验情境中都可能引发对生态效度的关注。本文讨论了生态效度的一些要求及其不同维度的性质,并对关于移动性发展的研究在这些限制条件方面进行了批判性评估。