• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 TAD 对上颌埋伏尖牙的三维运动分析:一项初步研究。

Three dimensional movement analysis of maxillary impacted canine using TADs: a pilot study.

机构信息

Orthodontics Department, School of Dentistry University of Genova largo Rosanna Benzi, 10 16132, Genoa, Italy.

Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2021 Jan 15;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00252-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13005-020-00252-0
PMID:33451343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare two different anchorage systems efficiency to disinclude impacted maxillary canines using as evaluation tool superimposed Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCTs).

METHODS

The study has been conducted with two parallel groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group test received treatment using as anchorage a miniscrew, control group was treated using an anchorage unit a trans palatal arch (TPA). Both groups received a calibrated traction force of 50 g. CBCT before treatment and 3 months after traction were superimposed and canine tip and root movement were evaluated in mm/month ratio.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between groups for apex displacement, tip displacement and observation timespan. Twenty-two patients (12 female, 10 male, mean age:13.4 years) undergoing orthodontic treatment for impacted maxillary canines were recruited for this study. No differences were observed between groups for apex displacement, tip displacement and observation timespan.

CONCLUSIONS

The present pilot study provided no evidence that indirect anchorage on miniscrews could make canine disimpaction faster than anchorage on a TPA. An apex root movement of 0.4-0.8 mm per month was found, while average canine tip movement ranged between 1.08 mm and 1.96 mm per month. No miniscrews failures were observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study reports the preliminary results of the randomized clinical trial registered at www.register.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01717417 ).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较两种不同的支抗系统在使用叠加锥形束 CT(CBCT)作为评估工具的情况下,排除上颌埋伏尖牙的效率。

方法

本研究采用平行分组,分配比例为 1:1。实验组使用迷你螺钉作为支抗,对照组使用横腭杆(TPA)作为支抗。两组均施加 50g 的校准牵引力。在治疗前和牵引后 3 个月对 CBCT 进行叠加,并以 mm/月的比值评估尖牙尖端和根的移动。

结果

两组在根尖位移、尖端位移和观察时间方面均无差异。本研究共纳入 22 名(12 名女性,10 名男性,平均年龄 13.4 岁)接受正畸治疗的上颌埋伏尖牙患者。两组在根尖位移、尖端位移和观察时间方面均无差异。

结论

本初步研究未提供证据表明迷你螺钉的间接支抗可以使尖牙的排齐速度快于 TPA 的支抗。发现根尖-根移动每月为 0.4-0.8mm,而平均尖牙尖端移动每月在 1.08mm 和 1.96mm 之间。未观察到迷你螺钉失败。

试验注册

本研究报告了在 www.register.clinicaltrials.gov(注册号:NCT01717417)注册的随机临床试验的初步结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/b7cc323f4bbe/13005_2020_252_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/56c33649aa57/13005_2020_252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/f63a88eae54b/13005_2020_252_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/7eca0b01f029/13005_2020_252_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/8ae1b0308950/13005_2020_252_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/4405ec39ac67/13005_2020_252_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/3d8afac19d65/13005_2020_252_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/2b9c74fb4ab0/13005_2020_252_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/b7cc323f4bbe/13005_2020_252_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/56c33649aa57/13005_2020_252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/f63a88eae54b/13005_2020_252_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/7eca0b01f029/13005_2020_252_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/8ae1b0308950/13005_2020_252_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/4405ec39ac67/13005_2020_252_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/3d8afac19d65/13005_2020_252_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/2b9c74fb4ab0/13005_2020_252_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a35/7809730/b7cc323f4bbe/13005_2020_252_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Three dimensional movement analysis of maxillary impacted canine using TADs: a pilot study.使用 TAD 对上颌埋伏尖牙的三维运动分析:一项初步研究。
Head Face Med. 2021 Jan 15;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00252-0.
2
Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.两种锥形束 CT 系统与全景成像在定位上颌埋伏尖牙和检测牙根吸收方面的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):93-102. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq034.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of angular, linear, and resorption features of maxillary impacted canines on cone-beam computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌埋伏尖牙角度、线性及吸收特征的三维评估
Oral Radiol. 2018 Jan;34(1):66-72. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0289-5. Epub 2017 May 2.
4
Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.上颌颊侧和腭侧尖牙阻生的病因分析:基于锥形束 CT 分析的观点。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.021.
5
Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study.上颌阻生尖牙对侧切牙根吸收的影响:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 May;78(3):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0077-6.
6
Three-dimensional changes in root angulation of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines after orthodontic traction: A retrospective before and after study.颊侧与腭侧上颌埋伏阻生尖牙正畸牵引后牙根倾斜角度的三维变化:一项回顾性前后研究。
Int Orthod. 2021 Jun;19(2):216-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Conventional Orthodontic Imaging Modalities for Localization of Impacted Maxillary Canines in Patients With Alveolar Cleft.三种传统与三维正畸影像学方法定位牙槽裂患者上颌埋伏尖牙的比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Feb;58(2):202-207. doi: 10.1177/1055665620946980. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction.上颌尖牙阻生的影像学预测因素
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Mar;147(3):345-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.018.
9
Root resorption of maxillary incisors after traction of unilateral vs bilateral impacted canines with reinforced anchorage.上颌尖牙单侧或双侧埋伏阻生经增强支抗牵引后牙根吸收的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Nov;154(5):645-656. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.015.
10
Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.上颌埋伏尖牙的诊断和治疗计划中传统射线照片和锥形束 CT 容积图像的对比分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Comparison of CBCT and Intraoral Scans for Assessing Orthodontic Traction of Impacted Canines with Clear Aligners.CBCT与口内扫描在评估使用隐形矫治器牵引埋伏尖牙的正畸牵引中的三维比较
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;13(7):286. doi: 10.3390/dj13070286.
2
Aligners as a Therapeutic Approach in Impacted Canine Treatment: A Systematic Review.矫治器作为阻生犬齿治疗的一种治疗方法:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3421. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103421.
3
Impacted Canine Management Using Aligners Supported by Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for impacted maxillary canines: A systematic review of the relationship between initial canine position and treatment outcome.上颌埋伏尖牙的干预措施:初始尖牙位置与治疗效果关系的系统评价。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):180-193. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12423. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Machine learning in orthodontics: .机器学习在正畸学中的应用: 。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):77-84. doi: 10.2319/012919-59.1. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines.
使用正畸支抗装置辅助的直丝弓矫治器处理埋伏阻生犬齿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010131.
替代锥形束计算机断层扫描方法分析上颌埋伏尖牙周围的骨密度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Sep;154(3):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.008.
4
Gingival thicknesses of maxillary and mandibular anterior regions in subjects with different craniofacial morphologies.不同颅面形态患者上颌前区和下颌前区的牙龈厚度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Sep;154(3):356-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.039.
5
Improved eruption path quantification and treatment time prognosis in alignment of impacted maxillary canines using CBCT imaging.使用CBCT成像对齐上颌阻生尖牙时改善萌出路径量化和治疗时间预后。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):597-607. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy028.
6
Association between 3D palatal morphology and upper arch dimensions in buccally displaced maxillary canines early in mixed dentition.混合牙列早期上颌颊向移位尖牙的三维腭部形态与上颌牙弓尺寸之间的关联
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):592-596. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy023.
7
Palatally impacted canines: A new 3-dimensional assessment of severity based on treatment objective.腭侧阻生尖牙:基于治疗目标的严重程度的新型三维评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Mar;153(3):387-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.020.
8
Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.三维前颅底重叠方法评估整体硬组织变化的可靠性:系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):233-245. doi: 10.2319/071217-468.1. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
9
Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection.使用超声检查确定正畸微螺钉植入部位的软组织厚度以定制螺钉选择。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):651-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026.
10
Torque Loss After Miniscrew Placement: An In-Vitro Study Followed by a Clinical Trial.微螺钉植入后的扭矩损失:一项体外研究及后续临床试验
Open Dent J. 2016 May 31;10:251-60. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010251. eCollection 2016.