Suppr超能文献

微创内固定与髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折的比较:随机临床试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析和系统评价。

MIPO versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000, Luzern, Switzerland.

Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):47-59. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01585-w. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the optimal operative technique for humeral shaft fractures. This meta-analysis aims to compare minimal-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures regarding healing, complications and functional results.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL/CINAHL were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing MIPO with nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models and presented as weighted odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Analyses were repeated stratified by study design (RCTs and observational studies).

RESULTS

A total of 2 RCTs (87 patients) and 5 observational studies (595 patients) were included. The effects estimated in observational studies and RCTs were similar in direction and magnitude for all outcomes except operation duration. MIPO has a lower risk for non-union (RD 7%; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5) and re-intervention (RD 13%; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). Functional shoulder (SMD 1.0, 95% CI 0.2-1.8) and elbow scores (SMD 0.4, 95% CI 0-0.8) were better among patients treated with MIPO. The risk for radial nerve palsy following surgery was equal (RD 2%; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2) and nerve function recovered spontaneously in all patients in both groups. No difference was detected with regard to infection, time to union and operation duration.

CONCLUSION

MIPO has a considerable lower risk for non-union and re-intervention, leads to better shoulder function and, to a lesser extent, better elbow function compared to nailing. Although nailing appears to be a viable option, the evidence suggests that MIPO should be the preferred treatment of choice. The learning curve of minimal-invasive plating should, however, be taken into account when interpreting these results.

摘要

目的

对于肱骨骨干骨折,目前尚无关于最佳手术技术的共识。本荟萃分析旨在比较微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)与髓内钉固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折的愈合、并发症和功能结果。

方法

在 PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL/CINAHL 中检索比较 MIPO 与髓内钉治疗肱骨骨干骨折的随机临床试验(RCT)和观察性研究。使用随机效应模型对研究间的效应估计值进行合并,并以加权比值比(OR)、风险差(RD)、均数差(MD)和标准化均数差(SMD)及其相应的 95%置信区间(95%CI)表示。根据研究设计(RCT 和观察性研究)进行分层后重复分析。

结果

共纳入 2 项 RCT(87 例患者)和 5 项观察性研究(595 例患者)。除手术时间外,观察性研究和 RCT 中估计的效果在所有结局方面的方向和大小均相似。MIPO 具有较低的不愈合风险(RD 7%;OR 0.2,95%CI 0.1-0.5)和再次干预风险(RD 13%;OR 0.3,95%CI 0.1-0.8)。采用 MIPO 治疗的患者肩关节(SMD 1.0,95%CI 0.2-1.8)和肘关节功能评分(SMD 0.4,95%CI 0-0.8)更好。术后桡神经麻痹的风险相等(RD 2%;OR 0.6,95%CI 0.3-1.2),两组患者的神经功能均自行恢复。两组之间在感染、愈合时间和手术时间方面无差异。

结论

与髓内钉相比,MIPO 具有较低的不愈合和再次干预风险,可改善肩关节功能,且在一定程度上改善肘关节功能。虽然髓内钉似乎是一种可行的选择,但这些证据表明,MIPO 应该是首选的治疗方法。然而,在解释这些结果时,应考虑微创接骨术的学习曲线。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验