• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在严重迟发性免疫介导的抗生素药物不良反应中体内和体外诊断工具的作用。

The Role of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Diagnostic Tools in Severe Delayed Immune-Mediated Adverse Antibiotic Drug Reactions.

机构信息

Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 May;9(5):2010-2015.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.052. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.052
PMID:33453452
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of in vivo and ex vivo diagnostic tools for delayed immune-mediated adverse drug reactions is currently ill defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the combination of skin testing and/or IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunoSpot assay (ELISpot) can aid diagnosis of these allergy phenotypes.

METHODS

Patients with antibiotic-associated severe delayed immune-mediated adverse drug reaction hypersensitivity, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, generalized bullous fixed drug eruption, and severe maculopapular exanthema, were prospectively recruited. In vivo testing was completed to the implicated drug(s), and ex vivo testing was performed with the patient's PBMCs stimulated with the relevant antibiotic concentrations for IFN-γ release ELISpot measurement.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria, with DRESS (42; 51.9%) accounting for most cases. Among the 63 (78%) who had an ELISpot assay performed, 34 (54%) were positive to at least 1 implicated antibiotic (median spot-forming units/million cells, 99.5; interquartile range, 68-187), with glycopeptide being a strong predictor of positivity (adjusted odds ratio, 6.11; 95% CI, 1.74-21.42). In combination (in vivo and ex vivo), 51 (63%) of those tested were positive to an implicated antibiotic. For DRESS and severe maculopapular exanthema associated with penicillins and cephalosporins, this combination confirmed the culprit agent in 11 of the 12 cases and in 6 of 7 for DRESS associated with glycopeptides.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that using in vivo in combination with ex vivo testing can enhance the diagnostic approach in these severe phenotypes by assisting with the identification of possible culprit antibiotics.

摘要

背景

目前,用于诊断迟发性免疫介导的药物不良反应的体内和体外诊断工具的使用尚未明确。

目的

确定皮肤试验和/或干扰素-γ酶联免疫斑点(ELISpot)检测是否有助于诊断这些过敏表型。

方法

前瞻性招募了抗生素相关性严重迟发性免疫介导的药物不良反应过敏反应患者,包括史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症、药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)、急性泛发性发疹性脓疱病、全身性大疱性固定性药疹和严重斑丘疹性发疹。对可疑药物进行了体内检测,并使用患者的 PBMC 与相关抗生素浓度刺激进行了体外检测,以进行干扰素-γ释放 ELISpot 测量。

结果

符合纳入标准的 81 例患者中,DRESS(42 例;51.9%)占大多数。在进行 ELISpot 检测的 63 例(78%)患者中,至少有 1 种可疑抗生素阳性(中位斑点形成单位/百万细胞,99.5;四分位间距,68-187),糖肽是阳性的强烈预测因素(调整优势比,6.11;95%CI,1.74-21.42)。在联合(体内和体外)检测中,51 例(63%)测试患者对可疑抗生素呈阳性。对于与青霉素和头孢菌素相关的 DRESS 和严重斑丘疹性发疹,该组合在 12 例中的 11 例和与糖肽相关的 DRESS 的 7 例中的 6 例中确认了罪魁祸首药物。

结论

这项研究表明,在这些严重表型中,结合体内和体外检测可以增强诊断方法,有助于确定可能的罪魁祸首抗生素。

相似文献

1
The Role of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Diagnostic Tools in Severe Delayed Immune-Mediated Adverse Antibiotic Drug Reactions.在严重迟发性免疫介导的抗生素药物不良反应中体内和体外诊断工具的作用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 May;9(5):2010-2015.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.052. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
The Combined Utility of Ex Vivo IFN-γ Release Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot Assay and In Vivo Skin Testing in Patients with Antibiotic-Associated Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.体外 IFN-γ 释放酶联免疫斑点检测与体内皮肤试验联合应用于抗生素相关性严重皮肤不良反应患者。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1287-1296.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.改善T细胞介导的药物不良反应诊断与管理的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:923991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991. eCollection 2022.
4
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients: A Multicenter Study.儿科患者的严重皮肤药物不良反应:一项多中心研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
Aetiopathogenesis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in children: A 9-year experience in a tertiary care paediatric hospital setting.儿童严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的病因发病机制:三级儿童保健医院 9 年经验。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Jan;50(1):61-73. doi: 10.1111/cea.13513. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Analysis of HLA-B Allelic Variation and IFN-γ ELISpot Responses in Patients with Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Associated with Drugs.药物相关性严重皮肤不良反应患者 HLA-B 等位基因变异与 IFN-γ ELISpot 反应分析
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):219-227.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
Delayed Skin Testing for Systemic Medications: Helpful or Not?延迟进行全身性药物的皮肤测试:有帮助还是没有帮助?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Sep;12(9):2268-2277. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.047. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
8
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions.皮肤药物不良反应。
Therapie. 2024 Mar-Apr;79(2):239-270. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
9
Dose Dependent Antimicrobial Cellular Cytotoxicity-Implications for Diagnostics.剂量依赖性抗菌细胞毒性——对诊断的启示
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 10;12:640012. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.640012. eCollection 2021.
10
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions related to systemic antibiotics.与全身性抗生素相关的严重皮肤不良反应。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 May;58(10):1377-85. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu126. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical diagnosis and management of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in children: An EAACI position paper.儿童药物超敏反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)的临床诊断与管理:欧洲变态反应和临床免疫学会立场文件
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jul;36(7):e70103. doi: 10.1111/pai.70103.
2
Drug allergy.药物过敏
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan 22;20(Suppl 3):78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00936-1.
3
Exploring cytokine outputs for diagnostics in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).
探索细胞因子输出在药物超敏反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)诊断中的应用。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Dec 7;17(12):101002. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Spectrum of offending drugs and cutaneous adverse drug reactions requiring hospitalisation in a tertiary South African hospital in TB/HIV endemic setting.在南非一家结核病/艾滋病流行地区的三级医院中,导致需要住院治疗的致病药物谱及皮肤药物不良反应
Front Allergy. 2024 Nov 28;5:1481281. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1481281. eCollection 2024.
5
Non-IgE-mediated drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions in pediatrics.儿科中非 IgE 介导的药物诱导的超敏反应。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2024 Dec 1;36(6):674-683. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001395. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
6
The Australasian Registry for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR) - Providing a roadmap for closing the diagnostic, patient, and healthcare gaps for a group of rare drug eruptions.澳大利亚严重皮肤不良反应注册中心(AUS-SCAR)——为消除一组罕见药物性皮疹的诊断、患者及医疗保健差距提供路线图。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Aug 5;17(8):100936. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100936. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Cephalosporin Allergy: Updates on Diagnostic Testing.头孢菌素类过敏:诊断检测的最新进展。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Oct;24(10):581-590. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01171-9. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
8
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions.严重皮肤不良反应。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Apr 25;10(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00514-0.
9
Blister fluid as a cellular input for diagnostics in drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions improves sensitivity and explores immunopathogenesis.水泡液作为药物性严重皮肤不良反应诊断的细胞输入物,可提高敏感性并探索免疫发病机制。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2021 Nov 30;1(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2021.11.001. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Sutton's law and severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Is the money in the blister?萨顿定律与严重皮肤药物不良反应:水疱里有“钱”吗?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2021 Dec 9;1(1):22-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2021.12.001. eCollection 2022 Feb.