• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅脑损伤患者的脑自动调节延迟。

Delay of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury patients.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Brussels, Route de Lennik, 808 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Brain Physics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106478. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106478
PMID:33454499
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adequate cerebral perfusion prevents secondary insult after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cerebral autoregulation (CAR) keeps cerebral blood flow (CBF) constant when arterial blood pressure (ABP) changes. Aim of the study was to evaluate the existence of delayed CAR in TBI patients and its possible association with outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed TBI patients. Flow velocity (FV) in middle cerebral artery, invasive intra-cranial pressure (ICP) and ABP were recorded. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as ABP - ICP. Mean flow index (Mx) > 0.3 defined altered CAR. Samples from patients with altered CAR were further analysed: FV signal was shifted backward relative to CPP; Mx was calculated after each shift (MxD). Mx > 0.3 plus MxD ≤ 0.3 defined delayed CAR. Favourable outcome (FO) at 6 months was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5.

RESULTS

154 patients were included. GCS was 6 [4-9], ICP was 14 [9-20] mmHg. Data on 6 months outcome were available for 131 patients: 104/131 patients (79 %) were alive; GOS was 4 [3-5]; 70/131 (53 %) had FO. Mx was 0.07 [-0.19 to 0.28] overall. Mx was lower in patients with FO compared others (0.00 [-0.21 to 0.20] vs 0.17 [-0.12 to 0.37], p = 0.02). 118 (77 %) patients had intact CAR and 36 (23 %) patients had altered CAR; 23 patients - 15 % of the general cohort and 64 % of patients with altered CAR - had delayed CAR. Delay in the autoregulatory response was 2 [1-4] seconds. 80/98 (82 %) of patients with intact CAR survived, compared to 16/21 (76 %) with delayed and 8/12 (67 %) with altered CAR (p = 0.20). 80/98 (58 %) patients with intact, 10/21 (48 %) patients with delayed and 3/12 (25 %) patients with altered CAR had FO (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

A subgroup of TBI patients with delayed CAR was identified. Delayed CAR was associated with better neurological outcome than altered CAR.

摘要

简介

颅脑损伤(TBI)后,充分的脑灌注可预防继发性损伤。脑自动调节(CAR)可在动脉血压(ABP)变化时保持脑血流(CBF)恒定。本研究旨在评估 TBI 患者 CAR 是否存在延迟及其与预后的可能相关性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 TBI 患者。记录大脑中动脉的血流速度(FV)、有创颅内压(ICP)和 ABP。脑灌注压(CPP)计算为 ABP - ICP。平均流量指数(Mx)> 0.3 定义为 CAR 改变。对存在 CAR 改变的患者进一步分析:FV 信号相对于 CPP 后移;每次移位后计算 Mx(MxD)。Mx > 0.3 加 MxD ≤ 0.3 定义为延迟 CAR。6 个月时的良好预后(FO)定义为格拉斯哥预后量表 4-5 分。

结果

共纳入 154 例患者。GCS 为 6 [4-9],ICP 为 14 [9-20]mmHg。131 例患者的 6 个月预后数据可用:104/131 例(79%)存活;GOS 为 4 [3-5]分;70/131 例(53%)预后良好。整体 Mx 为 0.07 [-0.19 至 0.28]。FO 患者的 Mx 低于其他患者(0.00 [-0.21 至 0.20] vs 0.17 [-0.12 至 0.37],p = 0.02)。118 例(77%)患者存在完整的 CAR,36 例(23%)患者存在 CAR 改变;23 例(15%的总体队列和 64%的 CAR 改变患者)患者存在延迟 CAR。自动调节反应延迟 2 [1-4] 秒。完整 CAR 组 80/98 例(82%)患者存活,延迟 CAR 组 16/21 例(76%)和 CAR 改变组 8/12 例(67%)存活(p = 0.20)。完整 CAR 组 80/98 例(58%)、延迟 CAR 组 10/21 例(48%)和 CAR 改变组 3/12 例(25%)患者预后良好(FO)(p = 0.03)。

结论

确定了 TBI 患者存在 CAR 延迟的亚组。与 CAR 改变相比,CAR 延迟与更好的神经功能预后相关。

相似文献

1
Delay of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury patients.颅脑损伤患者的脑自动调节延迟。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106478. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Novel index for predicting mortality during the first 24 hours after traumatic brain injury.预测创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内死亡率的新指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 21;131(6):1887-1895. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS18995. Print 2019 Dec 1.
3
Is Impaired Autoregulation Associated with Mortality in Patients with Severe Cerebral Diseases?严重脑部疾病患者的自动调节功能受损与死亡率相关吗?
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:181-5. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_37.
4
A continuous correlation between intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity reflects cerebral autoregulation impairment during intracranial pressure plateau waves.颅内压与脑血流速度之间的持续相关性反映了颅内压平台波期间的脑自动调节功能受损。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):514-25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9994-7.
5
Noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation assessment in traumatic brain injury: validation and utility.创伤性脑损伤中非侵入性脑血管自动调节评估:验证与效用
J Neurotrauma. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/08977150360517191.
6
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Association between intracranial, arterial pulse pressure amplitudes and cerebral autoregulation in head injury patients.颅脑损伤患者颅内动脉脉压振幅与脑自动调节功能之间的关联
Neurol Res. 2007 Sep;29(6):578-82. doi: 10.1179/016164107X172167.
8
Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的脉动颅内压和脑自动调节。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec;15(3):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9553-4.
9
Transcranial Doppler Systolic Flow Index and ICP-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices in Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤患者经颅多普勒收缩期血流指数与 ICP 衍生脑血管反应性指数
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jan 15;35(2):314-322. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5364. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
10
ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity.颅内压与激光多普勒脑血流反应指数评估脑自动调节能力。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Apr;28(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0472-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of fluid balance with traumatic brain injury outcomes: A systematic review.液体平衡与创伤性脑损伤结局的关联:一项系统综述。
J Intensive Med. 2025 Mar 24;5(3):276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Study protocol: Cerebral autoregulation, brain perfusion, and neurocognitive outcomes after traumatic brain injury -CAPCOG-TBI.研究方案:创伤性脑损伤后的脑自动调节、脑灌注和神经认知结果-CAPCOG-TBI。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1465226. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1465226. eCollection 2024.
3
Association of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio with mortality in patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
创伤性脑损伤患者C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值与死亡率的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33460. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33460. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
Secondary hyperperfusion injury following surgical evacuation for acute isolated epidural hematoma with concurrent cerebral herniation.急性孤立性硬膜外血肿伴脑疝手术清除术后的继发性过度灌注损伤。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1141395. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1141395. eCollection 2023.
5
Blood Pressure Control in Traumatic Subdural Hematomas.创伤性硬膜下血肿的血压控制
Cureus. 2022 Oct 25;14(10):e30654. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30654. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance evaluates changes of cerebral blood flow in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.动脉自旋标记磁共振评估轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的脑血流变化。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Aug 28;47(8):1016-1024. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210754.