• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生的同理心与对临终患者的关怀护理:对“无人独自离世”项目的评估

Empathy of Medical Students and Compassionate Care for Dying Patients: An Assessment of "No One Dies Alone" Program.

作者信息

Hojat Mohammadreza, DeSantis Jennifer, Ney David B, DeCleene-Do Hannah

机构信息

Asano-Gonnella Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Asano-Gonnella Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1164-1168. doi: 10.1177/2374373520962605. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520962605
PMID:33457560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786760/
Abstract

The "No One Dies Alone" (NODA) program was initiated to provide compassionate companions to the bedside of dying patients. This study was designed to test the following hypotheses: (1) Empathy scores would be higher among medical students who volunteered to participate in the NODA program than nonvolunteers; (2) Spending time with dying patients would enhance empathy in medical students. Study sample included 525 first- and second-year medical students, 54 of whom volunteered to participate in the NODA program. Of these volunteers, 26 had the opportunity to visit a dying patient (experimental group), and 28 did not, due to scheduling conflicts (volunteer control group). The rest of the sample (n = 471) comprised the "nonvolunteer control group." Comparisons of the aforementioned groups on scores of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy confirmed the first research hypothesis ( < .05, Cohen = 0.37); the second hypothesis was not confirmed. This study has implications for the assessment of empathy in physicians-in-training, and timely for recruiting compassionate companion volunteers (armed with personal protective equipment) at the bedside of lonely dying patients infected by COVID-19.

摘要

“无人独自离世”(NODA)项目旨在为临终患者床边提供富有同情心的陪伴者。本研究旨在检验以下假设:(1)自愿参与NODA项目的医学生的同理心得分高于非志愿者;(2)与临终患者相处会增强医学生的同理心。研究样本包括525名一年级和二年级医学生,其中54人自愿参与NODA项目。在这些志愿者中,26人有机会探访临终患者(实验组),28人因日程冲突未能探访(志愿者对照组)。样本中的其余部分(n = 471)构成“非志愿者对照组”。通过杰斐逊同理心量表得分对上述各组进行比较,证实了第一个研究假设(<.05,科恩效应量 = 0.37);第二个假设未得到证实。本研究对评估实习医生的同理心具有启示意义,同时也为招募富有同情心的陪伴志愿者(配备个人防护装备)到感染新冠病毒的孤独临终患者床边提供了及时的参考。

相似文献

1
Empathy of Medical Students and Compassionate Care for Dying Patients: An Assessment of "No One Dies Alone" Program.医学生的同理心与对临终患者的关怀护理:对“无人独自离世”项目的评估
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1164-1168. doi: 10.1177/2374373520962605. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Evaluating the Relationship Between Participation in Student-Run Free Clinics and Changes in Empathy in Medical Students.评估参与学生运营的免费诊所与医学生同理心变化之间的关系。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jul;8(3):122-126. doi: 10.1177/2150131916685199. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Can communication skills training improve empathy? A six-year longitudinal study of medical students in Japan.沟通技巧训练能否提高同理心?对日本医学生进行的一项为期六年的纵向研究。
Med Teach. 2019 Feb;41(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1460657. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
4
Assessment of Clinical Empathy Among Medical Students Using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version.使用杰斐逊共情量表学生版评估医学生的临床共情能力
Cureus. 2019 Feb 28;11(2):e4160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4160.
5
Empathy in medical students of Córdoba, Argentina.阿根廷科尔多瓦医科学生的同理心。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;117(2):81-86. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.81.
6
Relationships between scores of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI).杰斐逊医生共情量表(JSPE)得分与人际反应指针量表(IRI)得分之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2005 Nov;27(7):625-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590500069744.
7
Reliability and validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy in undergraduate nursing students.本科护生杰斐逊共情量表的信效度研究
J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(1):73-88. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.73.
8
Measuring empathy in a group of South African undergraduate medical students using the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.使用杰斐逊共情量表学生版对一组南非本科医学生的共情能力进行测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 May 27;11(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1956.
9
Investigating the relation between self-assessment and patients' assessments of physicians-in-training empathy: a multicentric, observational, cross-sectional study in three teaching hospitals in Brazil.调查自我评估与实习医生共情的患者评估之间的关系:巴西三所教学医院的一项多中心、观察性、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e029356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029356.
10
Effectiveness of empathy clinical education for children's nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.共情临床教育对儿童护理专业学生的效果:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Feb;85:104260. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104260. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Language of Compassion: Hospital Chaplains' Compassion Capacity Reduces Patient Depression via Other-Oriented, Inclusive Language.同情的语言:医院牧师的同情能力通过以他人为导向的包容性语言减轻患者的抑郁情绪。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2023 Oct;14(10):2485-2498. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-01907-6. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
No One Dies Alone: Addressing a Gap in Medical Education.无人独自离世:填补医学教育中的一项空白。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022 Nov 7;12(6):24-26. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1125. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Empathy Decline in the Clinical Phase of Medical Education? A Nationwide, Multi-Institutional, Cross-Sectional Study of Students at DO-Granting Medical Schools.医学教育临床阶段同理心是否会下降?多机构、全国性横断面研究。
Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):911-918. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003175.
2
The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students.杰斐逊同理心量表:医学生测量特性、潜在构成要素、潜在变量结构和全国常模的全国性研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):899-920. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Assessing empathy development in medical education: a systematic review.评估医学教育中的同理心发展:一项系统综述。
Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):300-10. doi: 10.1111/medu.12806.
4
The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy.医生共情与疾病并发症之间的关系:意大利帕尔马地区初级保健医生及其糖尿病患者的实证研究。
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1243-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf.
5
Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients.医生的同理心与糖尿病患者的临床结局。
Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):359-64. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1.
6
The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school.问题出在第三年:一项关于医学院校同理心衰退的纵向研究。
Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1182-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.
7
Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty.医生的同理心:定义、组成部分、测量方法以及与性别和专业的关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1563-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563.
8
Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender.医学生的同理心与学业成绩、临床能力及性别的关系。
Med Educ. 2002 Jun;36(6):522-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01234.x.