Acupuncture and Meridian Science Research Center, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anatomy and Acupoint, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):1663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81134-6.
The operant conditioning has been less studied than the classical conditioning as a mechanism of placebo-like effect, and two distinct learning mechanisms have never been compared to each other in terms of their neural activities. Twenty-one participants completed cue-learning based pain rating tasks while their brain responses were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. After choosing (instrumental) or viewing (classical) one of three predictive cues (low- and high-pain cues with different level of certainty), they received painful stimuli according to the selected cues. Participants completed the same task during the test session, except that they received only a high pain stimulus regardless of the selected cues to identify the effects of two learning paradigms. While receiving a high pain stimulation, low-pain cue significantly reduced pain ratings compared to high-pain cue, and the overall ratings were significantly lower under operant than under classical conditioning. Operant behavior activated the temporoparietal junction significantly more than the passive behavior did, and neural activity in the primary somatosensory cortex was significantly reduced during pain in instrumental as compared with classical conditioning trials. The results suggest that pain modulation can be induced by classical and operant conditioning, and mechanisms of attention and context change are involved in instrumental learning.
操作性条件作用作为安慰剂样效应的一种机制,其研究不如经典条件作用多,而且这两种不同的学习机制的神经活动从未相互比较过。21 名参与者在进行基于线索的疼痛评分任务时完成了功能磁共振成像测量他们的大脑反应。在选择(工具性)或观察(经典)三个预测线索(具有不同确定性水平的低疼痛线索和高疼痛线索)中的一个之后,他们根据所选线索接受疼痛刺激。参与者在测试会议期间完成了相同的任务,但无论选择了哪个线索,他们只接受了一个高疼痛刺激,以确定两种学习范式的影响。在接受高疼痛刺激时,与高疼痛线索相比,低疼痛线索显著降低了疼痛评分,并且在操作性条件作用下的总体评分明显低于经典条件作用。与被动行为相比,操作性行为显著激活了颞顶联合区,并且在工具性条件作用试验中,与经典条件作用试验相比,初级体感皮层的神经活动显著减少。结果表明,疼痛可以通过经典和操作性条件作用来调节,并且注意和上下文变化的机制参与了工具性学习。