Department of Orthopaedics, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated With Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated With Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81242-3.
Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.
闭合复位和髓内钉内固定治疗移位的第五掌骨颈骨折(FMNFs)是一种可行且有效的方法。本研究旨在比较单枚和双枚顺行弹性髓内钉(AEIMNs)治疗移位的 FMNFs 的临床和影像学结果。33 例患者接受单枚 2.0mm AEIMN 治疗,34 例患者接受双枚 1.5mm AEIMN 治疗。临床和影像学结果包括握力、主动活动范围(ROM)、第五掌指关节(MCP)的主动屈伸、背侧成角丢失和第五掌骨的掌骨缩短。治疗后 12 个月,两组间握力、ROM 或第五 MCP 关节的屈伸无显著差异。双钉组背侧成角丢失、掌骨缩短和第五 MCP 关节伸展的平均数值均优于单钉组(背侧成角丢失,2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°,P = 0.009;掌骨缩短,1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm,P = 0.028;第五 MCP 关节伸展,7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°,P = 0.012)。总之,双 AEIMN 固定提供了更好的 MCP 伸展和影像学结果,优于单 AEIMN 固定。