Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Olsson G, Tuomilehto J, Elmfeldt D, Berglund G
Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
JAMA. 1988 Apr 1;259(13):1976-82.
The present study of primary prevention in white men aged 40 to 64 years attempts to investigate whether a beta-blocker given as initial antihypertensive treatment would lower total mortality to a greater extent than thiazide diuretics. Patients were randomized to metoprolol (n = 1609, 8110 patient-years) or a thiazide diuretic (n = 1625, 8070 patient-years). The median follow-up time was 4.2 years. The mean dose of metoprolol was 174 mg/d, and of thiazide diuretics, 46 mg/d of hydrochlorothiazide or 4.4 mg/d of bendroflumethiazide. Identical control of blood pressure was achieved using a fixed therapeutic schedule. Total mortality was significantly lower for metoprolol than for thiazide diuretics because of fewer deaths from coronary heart disease and stroke. Total mortality was also significantly lower in smokers randomized to metoprolol. The benefit demonstrated in patients treated with metoprolol seems to have important implications for clinical practice.
本项针对40至64岁白人男性的一级预防研究,试图探究作为初始抗高血压治疗药物的β受体阻滞剂,在降低总死亡率方面是否比噻嗪类利尿剂效果更佳。患者被随机分为美托洛尔组(n = 1609,8110患者年)和噻嗪类利尿剂组(n = 1625,8070患者年)。中位随访时间为4.2年。美托洛尔的平均剂量为174毫克/天,噻嗪类利尿剂的平均剂量为46毫克/天的氢氯噻嗪或4.4毫克/天的苄氟噻嗪。通过固定治疗方案实现了相同的血压控制。由于冠心病和中风导致的死亡人数较少,美托洛尔组的总死亡率显著低于噻嗪类利尿剂组。随机分配到美托洛尔组的吸烟者的总死亡率也显著较低。美托洛尔治疗患者所显示的益处似乎对临床实践具有重要意义。