Suppr超能文献

美国麻醉委员会 APPLIED 考试初始认证的构念效度验证。

Construct Validation of the American Board of Anesthesiology's APPLIED Examination for Initial Certification.

机构信息

From The American Board of Anesthesiology, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2021 Jul 1;133(1):226-232. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005364.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Anesthesiology administers the APPLIED Examination as a part of initial certification, which as of 2018 includes 2 components-the Standardized Oral Examination (SOE) and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The goal of this study is to investigate the measurement construct(s) of the APPLIED Examination to assess whether the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs (ie, factors).

METHODS

Exploratory item factor analysis of candidates' performance ratings was used to determine the number of constructs, and confirmatory item factor analysis to estimate factor loadings within each construct and correlation(s) between the constructs.

RESULTS

In exploratory item factor analysis, the log-likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion index favored the 3-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE, OSCE Communication and Professionalism, and OSCE Technical Skills. The Bayesian information criterion index favored the 2-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE and the OSCE. In confirmatory item factor analysis, both models suggest moderate correlation between the SOE factor and the OSCE factor; the correlation was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.55) for the 3-factor model and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.54-0.64) for the 2-factor model. The factor loadings were lower for Technical Skills stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.11 to 0.25) compared with those of the SOE and Communication and Professionalism stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.36 to 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The analyses provide evidence that the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs, supporting the rationale for administering both components of the APPLIED Examination for initial certification in anesthesiology.

摘要

背景

美国麻醉师委员会管理着 APPLIED 考试,作为初始认证的一部分,该考试自 2018 年起包括 2 个部分——标准化口头考试(SOE)和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。本研究旨在探讨 APPLIED 考试的测量结构,以评估 SOE 和 OSCE 是否测量不同的结构(即因素)。

方法

采用候选人表现评分的探索性项目因素分析来确定结构的数量,并采用验证性项目因素分析来估计每个结构内的因素负荷以及结构之间的相关性。

结果

在探索性项目因素分析中,对数似然比检验和赤池信息量准则指标支持 3 因素模型,该模型的因素反映了 SOE、OSCE 沟通和专业精神以及 OSCE 技术技能。贝叶斯信息准则指标支持 2 因素模型,该模型的因素反映了 SOE 和 OSCE。在验证性项目因素分析中,这两个模型都表明 SOE 因素和 OSCE 因素之间存在中度相关性;3 因素模型的相关系数为 0.49(95%置信区间 [CI],0.42-0.55),2 因素模型的相关系数为 0.61(95% CI,0.54-0.64)。OSCE 的技术技能站的因素负荷较低(范围为 0.11 至 0.25),而 OSCE 的 SOE 和沟通与专业精神站的因素负荷较高(范围为 0.36 至 0.50)。

结论

分析结果提供了证据,表明 SOE 和 OSCE 测量不同的结构,支持在麻醉学初始认证中同时管理 APPLIED 考试的这两个部分的原理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验