Stegaru B, Loose R, Keller H, Buss J, Wetzel E
I. Medical Clinic Cardiology, Klinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, West Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Mar 25;61(9):74E-77E. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90094-x.
Forty patients with coronary artery disease and scintigraphically proven myocardial ischemia were randomized into 2 groups receiving 4 weeks of treatment with either 120 mg of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) release or 60 mg of nifedipine release. Control exercise testing and myocardial scintigraphy were continued until anginal pains occurred, and repeated at identical individual workloads at the end of the 4 weeks of drug therapy. Myocardial scintigrams were evaluated by quantitative recording of counts in 60 segments/frame. Twenty patients in the ISDN group (group I) exhibited 47 significantly ischemic areas. The remaining 20 patients (group II), treated with nifedipine, had 50 ischemic areas before therapy. In the ischemic areas in group I, there was a mean difference of 30.9% between counts at rest and during exercise in the pretreatment period, and a difference of 18.1% after therapy (39.0%). In group II, the pretreatment difference was 28.8%, decreasing to 20.6% after therapy (17.8%). Both groups of patients were subsequently subdivided into 3 subsets: (1) significantly improved perfusion, (2) significant worsening, and (3) unchanged myocardial perfusion. Group I had 59.5% of areas with significant improvement and 10.6% of areas with significant worsening. In 29.7% of the areas, the findings were unchanged. Group II had improvement in 40% of areas, of significantly worsened areas in 6%, and unchanged areas in 54%, in both groups myocardial ischemia was reduced by therapy, but ISDN improved myocardial perfusion to a considerably greater extent than did nifedipine.
40例经冠状动脉造影证实患有冠心病且心肌缺血的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受为期4周的治疗,一组服用120毫克缓释硝酸异山梨酯(ISDN),另一组服用60毫克缓释硝苯地平。继续进行对照运动试验和心肌闪烁扫描,直至出现心绞痛,并在4周药物治疗结束时,以相同的个体工作量重复进行。通过定量记录每帧60个节段的计数来评估心肌闪烁图。ISDN组(I组)的20例患者出现47个明显缺血区域。其余20例接受硝苯地平治疗的患者(II组)在治疗前有50个缺血区域。在I组的缺血区域,治疗前期静息和运动时计数的平均差异为30.9%,治疗后差异为18.1%(39.0%)。在II组,治疗前期差异为28.8%,治疗后降至20.6%(17.8%)。两组患者随后又被细分为3个亚组:(1)灌注显著改善,(2)显著恶化,(3)心肌灌注无变化。I组有59.5%的区域显著改善,10.6%的区域显著恶化。在29.7%的区域,结果未变。II组有40%的区域改善,6%的区域显著恶化,54%的区域未变。两组患者的心肌缺血均通过治疗得到减轻,但ISDN比硝苯地平在更大程度上改善了心肌灌注。