Suppr超能文献

对一项旨在减少医院跌倒的常规服务改进项目的机会性评估。

An opportunistic evaluation of a routine service improvement project to reduce falls in hospital.

作者信息

Sheppard Diane, Clarke Elaine, Hemming Karla, Martin James, Lilford Richard

机构信息

University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06073-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventing falls in hospital is a perennial patient safety issue. The University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire initiated a programme to train ward staff in accordance with guidelines. The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands was asked to expedite an independent evaluation of the initiative. We set out to describe the intervention to implement the guidelines and to evaluate it by means of a step-wedge cluster study using routinely collected data.

METHODS

The evaluation was set up as a partially randomised, step-wedge cluster study, but roll-out across wards was more rapid than planned. The study was therefore analysed as a time-series. Primary outcome was rate of falls per 1000 Occupied Bed Days (OBDs) collected monthly using routine data. Data was analysed using a mixed-effects Poisson regression model, with a fixed effect for intervention, time and post-intervention time. We allowed for random variations across clusters in initial fall rate, pre-intervention slope and post-intervention slope.

RESULTS

There was an average of 6.62 falls per 1000 OBDs in the control phase, decreasing to an average of 5.89 falls per 1000 OBDs in the period after implementation to the study end. Regression models showed no significant step change in fall rates (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14). However, there was a gradual decrease, of approximately 3%, after the intervention was introduced (IRR: 0.97 per month, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The intervention was associated with a small but statistically significantly improvement in falls rates. Expedited roll-out of an intervention may vitiate a step-wedge cluster design, but the intervention can still be studied using a time-series analysis. Assuming that there is some value in time series analyses, this is better than no evaluation at all. However, care is needed in making causal inferences given the non-experimental nature of the design.

摘要

背景

预防医院内跌倒一直是患者安全问题。考文垂与沃里克郡大学医院启动了一项按照指南培训病房工作人员的计划。英国国家卫生研究院西米德兰兹应用健康研究与护理领导力合作中心被要求加快对该计划进行独立评估。我们着手描述实施指南的干预措施,并通过使用常规收集数据的阶梯楔形整群研究对其进行评估。

方法

评估设定为部分随机的阶梯楔形整群研究,但在各病房的推广速度比计划更快。因此,该研究作为时间序列进行分析。主要结局是每月使用常规数据收集的每1000个占用床日(OBD)的跌倒率。数据使用混合效应泊松回归模型进行分析,并对干预、时间和干预后时间设定固定效应。我们考虑了各整群在初始跌倒率、干预前斜率和干预后斜率方面的随机差异。

结果

在对照阶段,每1000个OBD平均有6.62次跌倒,在实施后至研究结束期间降至每1000个OBD平均5.89次跌倒。回归模型显示跌倒率无显著的阶梯变化(发病率比:1.02,95%置信区间:0.92 - 1.14)。然而,在引入干预后有逐渐下降,约为3%(每月发病率比:0.97,95%置信区间:0.95 - 0.99)。

结论

该干预措施与跌倒率的小幅但在统计学上显著的改善相关。干预措施的快速推广可能会损害阶梯楔形整群设计,但仍可使用时间序列分析来研究该干预措施。假设时间序列分析有一定价值,这总比根本不进行评估要好。然而,鉴于该设计的非实验性质,在进行因果推断时需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验