Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Aug;50(8):1040-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.022. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
The decision about which metopic synostosis patients should undergo surgery remains controversial. Multiple measures for radiographic severity have been developed in order to determine the optimal criteria for treatment. The aim of this study was to perform an extensive craniomorphometric analysis of patients who underwent surgery for metopic synostosis to validate and compare the various severity scales developed for this non-syndromic craniosynostosis. A comparative morphometric analysis was performed using computed tomography scans of preoperative metopic synostosis patients (n=167) and normal controls (n=44). Measurements included previous and newly developed metopic severity indices. Volumetric and area analyses were used to determine the degree of anterior cranial area and potential volume restrictions. Of the severity indices measured, the frontal angle, endocranial bifrontal angle (EBF), adjusted EBF (aEBF), anterior cranial fossa angle, horizontal cone angle, and bitemporal/biparietal distance ratio were significantly different in the metopic subjects relative to controls overall. However, metopic index, orbital rim angle, foramen ovale distance, and cranial volume exhibited no significant difference from controls. Only the frontal angle and aEBF correlated with the changes in anterior cranial dimensions observed in metopic synostosis. In conclusion, the frontal angle and aEBF provide the most accurate measures of severity in metopic synostosis.
对于哪些额骨骨缝早闭患者应该接受手术治疗的问题,目前仍存在争议。为了确定最佳的治疗标准,已经制定了多种影像学严重程度的测量方法。本研究旨在对接受额骨骨缝早闭手术的患者进行广泛的颅形态计量学分析,以验证和比较为此种非综合征性颅缝早闭开发的各种严重程度量表。对术前额骨骨缝早闭患者(n=167)和正常对照组(n=44)的计算机断层扫描进行了比较形态计量学分析。测量包括以前和新开发的额骨严重程度指数。体积和面积分析用于确定前颅区的程度和潜在的体积限制。在所测量的严重程度指数中,额骨角度、颅内双额角(EBF)、调整后的 EBF(aEBF)、前颅窝角度、水平锥体角度和双侧颞部/双侧顶骨距离比在额骨患者中与对照组相比总体上存在显著差异。然而,额缝指数、眶缘角度、卵圆孔距离和颅腔容积与额骨骨缝早闭中观察到的前颅尺寸变化无显著差异。只有额骨角度和 aEBF 与额骨骨缝早闭中观察到的前颅尺寸变化相关。总之,额骨角度和 aEBF 提供了额骨骨缝早闭严重程度的最准确测量方法。