State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Department of Radiology, Oshei Children's Hospital, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;142:110624. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110624. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Retrospective chart review.
Tertiary care pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An electronic medical record was queried to identify children with midline neck masses who underwent pre-operative neck US and had a histopathologic diagnosis of either TGDC or DC. Two pediatric radiologists, blinded to the pathologic diagnosis, evaluated the US images and documented the presence of pre-determined characteristics of each mass. Potential differentiating factors were analyzed for their predictive power. The SIST (septations, irregular walls, solid components = TGDC) score was determined as well as inter-observer agreement. Using the characteristics that had significant predictive power, we used the data to develop an algorithm to improve predicting cyst type.
Pathologically, there were 47 TGDC and 25 DC. The inter-observer agreement about the pathologic diagnosis between the two radiologists was substantial, K = 0.66. Overall, the SIST score predicted the correct diagnosis 67% of the time. Radiologist 1 and radiologist 2 were more accurate than the SIST score alone, making the correct diagnosis 96% and 86% of the time, respectively. In our study, we found that the most important US characteristics in differentiating TGDC and DC are: internal Septations, depth relative to Strap muscles, Shape and Solid parts (4 S algorithm). The SIST score criteria were individually shown to be significant and sensitive in recognizing DC, however, they were not specific and often misclassified TGDC as DC. We developed a new sequential filtering algorithm that more accurately differentiates cysts. This new algorithm uses step-wise filtering of characteristics, first for Septations, then for depth to Straps, then Shape of the cyst and lastly Solid parts (4 S algorithm). This algorithm correctly categorized cyst type in 100% of patients in our study.
Pre-operatively differentiating TGDC and DC continues to be a challenge. Using our 4 S algorithm, we can more definitively differentiate TGDC from DC compared to the SIST score. All SIST score characteristics were significant and sensitive in detecting dermoid cysts, however, not very specific. The radiologists' judgment and accuracy was better than the SIST score. The 4 S algorithm uses sequential filtering of important characteristics: Septations, depth to Straps, Shape of cyst and lastly Solid parts to improve diagnostic accuracy.
1)评估先前建立的 SIST 评分的可重复性。2)确定使用超声(US)特征区分甲状舌管囊肿(TGDC)和皮样囊肿(DC)的观察者间一致性。3)改进术前区分 TGDC 和 DC 的方法。
回顾性病历回顾。
三级儿童医院。
电子病历查询识别接受术前颈部 US 检查并经组织病理学诊断为 TGDC 或 DC 的中线颈部肿块儿童。两名儿科放射科医生在不了解病理诊断的情况下评估 US 图像并记录每个肿块的预定特征的存在。分析潜在的鉴别因素以评估其预测能力。确定 SIST(分隔、不规则壁、实性成分=TGDC)评分和观察者间一致性。利用具有显著预测能力的特征,我们使用数据开发算法来提高预测囊肿类型的能力。
病理上,有 47 个 TGDC 和 25 个 DC。两位放射科医生对病理诊断的观察者间一致性为中等,K=0.66。总体而言,SIST 评分 67%的时间预测正确诊断。放射科医生 1 和放射科医生 2 比 SIST 评分更准确,分别有 96%和 86%的时间做出正确诊断。在我们的研究中,我们发现区分 TGDC 和 DC 的最重要的 US 特征是:内部分隔、与 Straps 肌肉的深度、形状和实性部分(4S 算法)。SIST 评分标准在识别 DC 方面被证明是重要和敏感的,但特异性差,经常将 TGDC 误诊为 DC。我们开发了一种新的序贯过滤算法,可以更准确地区分囊肿。该新算法使用特征的逐步过滤,首先是分隔,然后是到 Straps 的深度,然后是囊肿的形状,最后是实性部分(4S 算法)。该算法在我们的研究中 100%正确分类了患者的囊肿类型。
术前区分 TGDC 和 DC 仍然是一个挑战。与 SIST 评分相比,使用我们的 4S 算法可以更明确地区分 TGDC 和 DC。SIST 评分的所有特征在检测皮样囊肿方面均具有重要意义和敏感性,但特异性不高。放射科医生的判断和准确性优于 SIST 评分。4S 算法使用重要特征的顺序过滤:分隔、到 Straps 的深度、囊肿的形状和最后是实性部分,以提高诊断准确性。