Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative & School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia(1).
Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative & School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia(1). Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@birthsmalltalk.
Women Birth. 2022 Feb;35(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
A care bundle to reduce severe perineal trauma (the bundle) was introduced in 28 Australian maternity hospitals in 2018. The bundle includes five components of which only one - warm perineal compresses - has highest level evidence. There is scant published research about the impact of implementation of perineal bundles.
How does a perineal care bundle impact midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals?
Purposively sampled midwives who worked in hospitals where the bundle had been implemented. Interested midwives were recruited to participate in one-to-one, semi-structured interviews. The researchers conducted critical, reflexive thematic analysis informed by Foucauldian concepts of power.
We interviewed 12 midwives from five hospitals in one state of Australia. Participants varied by age, clinical role, experience, and education. Three themes were generated: 1) bundle design and implementation 2) changing midwifery practice: obedience, subversion, and compliance; and 3) obstetric dominance and midwifery submission.
The bundle exemplifies tensions between obstetric and midwifery constructs of safety in normal birth. Participants' responses appear consistent with oppressed group behaviour previously reported in nurses and midwives. Women expect midwives to facilitate maternal autonomy yet decision-making in maternity care is commonly geared towards obtaining consent. In our study midwives encouraged women to consent or decline depending on their personal preferences.
The introduction of the perineal bundle acts as an exemplar of obstetric dominance in Australian maternity care. We recommend midwives advocate autonomy - women's and their own - by using clinical judgement, evidence, and woman-centred care.
2018 年,28 家澳大利亚产科医院引入了会阴护理包(护理包),以减少严重的会阴创伤。该护理包包含五个组成部分,其中只有一个——温暖的会阴压缩包——具有最高水平的证据。关于会阴护理包实施的影响,发表的研究很少。
会阴护理包如何影响澳大利亚产科医院的助产实践?
在护理包实施的医院中,有针对性地抽取了助产士。有兴趣的助产士被招募参加一对一的半结构化访谈。研究人员根据福柯的权力概念进行了批判性的、反思性的主题分析。
我们采访了来自澳大利亚一个州的五家医院的 12 名助产士。参与者在年龄、临床角色、经验和教育方面存在差异。产生了三个主题:1)护理包的设计和实施;2)改变助产实践:服从、颠覆和遵守;3)产科主导和助产士服从。
护理包体现了正常分娩中产科和助产概念安全之间的紧张关系。参与者的反应似乎与之前在护士和助产士中报告的受压迫群体行为一致。女性希望助产士促进产妇自主权,但产科护理中的决策通常是为了获得同意。在我们的研究中,助产士根据个人喜好鼓励女性同意或拒绝。
会阴护理包的引入是澳大利亚产科护理中产科主导地位的一个范例。我们建议助产士通过使用临床判断、证据和以妇女为中心的护理来倡导自主权——妇女的自主权和她们自己的自主权。