Khosravi Sepehr, Khayyamfar Amirmahdi, Shemshadi Milad, Koltapeh Masoud Pourghahramani, Sadeghi-Naini Mohsen, Ghodsi Zahra, Shokraneh Farhad, Bardsiri Mohadeseh Sarbaz, Derakhshan Pegah, Komlakh Khalil, Vaccaro Alex R, Fehlings Michael G, Guest James D, Noonan Vanessa, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa
Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Global Spine J. 2022 Jan;12(1):166-181. doi: 10.1177/2192568220981988. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Scoping review.
To identify a practical and reproducible approach to organize Quality of Care Indicators (QoCI) in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).
A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Date: May 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2018), and EMBASE (1974 to May 2018). Two independent reviewers screened 6092 records and included 262 full texts, among which 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. We included studies, with no language restriction, containing at least 1 quality of care indicator for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Each potential indicator was evaluated in an online, focused group discussion to define its categorization (healthcare system structure, medical process, and individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury related outcomes), definition, survey options, and scale.
A total of 87 indicators were identified from 60 studies screened using our eligibility criteria. We defined each indicator. Out of 87 indicators, 37 appraised the healthcare system structure, 30 evaluated medical processes, and 20 included individuals with TSCI related outcomes. The healthcare system structure included the impact of the cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation, as well as staff and patient perception of treatment. The medical processes included targeting physical activities for improvement of health-related outcomes and complications. Changes in motor score, functional independence, and readmission rates were reported as individuals with TSCI-related outcomes indicators.
Indicators of quality of care in the management of individuals with TSCI are important for health policy strategists to standardize healthcare assessment, for clinicians to improve care, and for data collection efforts including registries.
范围综述。
确定一种实用且可重复的方法,用于整理创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)患者的医疗质量指标(QoCI)。
在Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(日期:2018年5月)、MEDLINE(1946年至2018年5月)和EMBASE(1974年至2018年5月)中进行了全面的文献综述。两名独立评审员筛选了6092条记录,纳入了262篇全文,其中60项研究纳入定性分析。我们纳入了无语言限制、包含至少一项创伤性脊髓损伤患者医疗质量指标的研究。每个潜在指标在在线焦点小组讨论中进行评估,以确定其分类(医疗保健系统结构、医疗过程以及与创伤性脊髓损伤相关的个体结局)、定义、调查选项和量表。
根据我们的纳入标准,从筛选的60项研究中总共确定了87项指标。我们对每个指标进行了定义。在87项指标中,37项评估医疗保健系统结构,30项评估医疗过程,20项纳入与创伤性脊髓损伤相关的个体结局。医疗保健系统结构包括住院和康复费用的影响,以及工作人员和患者对治疗的看法。医疗过程包括针对身体活动以改善与健康相关的结局和并发症。运动评分、功能独立性和再入院率的变化被报告为与创伤性脊髓损伤相关的个体结局指标。
创伤性脊髓损伤患者管理中的医疗质量指标对于卫生政策制定者规范医疗评估、临床医生改善护理以及包括登记处在内的数据收集工作都很重要。