Mukherjee D, Hooda A K, Jairam A, Nair Ranjith K, Sharma Sourabh
Senior Advisor (Med & Nephrology), Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India.
Director General (Org & Pers), O/o DGAFMS, Ministry of Defence, 'M' Block, New Delhi 110001, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Jan;77(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
We present our experience of ABO-incompatible renal transplant using immunoadsorption (IA) columns. We have compared efficacy of two commercially available columns.
This single-center prospective study was conducted at Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi. All consecutive ABO-incompatible renal transplants from January 2014 to February 2018 were analyzed. Of 30 patients who underwent transplantations, 28 underwent antibody depletion with immunoadsorption columns. Of them, 14 cases were in the "Glycosorb group," while 14 in the "Adsopak group."
The donors in the Adsopak group were older than those in the Glycosorb group (p < 0.05). Both groups had spousal donors in majority. The cutoff for the antibody titer was 1:8. The median titer in the Adsopak group was 128 (range, 1:4 to 1:2048), while that in the Glycosorb group was 24 (range, 1:8 to 1:128). All patients in the Glycosorb group had baseline titers ≤1:128, while 13 patients in the Adsopak group had baseline titers ≤1:512. Nil titer was achievable with Glycosorb® (50%,7/14) but not with Adsopak® (P < 0.01). Around 4 sessions were required for the Glycosorb group, while around 8 sessions were required for the Adsopak group before transplantation (p < 0.001). The Glycosorb group was advantageous in terms of graft failure because no rejection was noticed in these patients in their follow-up period. Three patients in the Adsopak group developed rejection (two had mixed rejection, and one had antibody-mediated rejection). Four patients died of sepsis (three in the Glycosorb and one in the Adsopak group). Lower baseline serum creatinine level was achieved in the Glycosorb group.
Results of ABO-incompatible renal transplantation were satisfactory, and the use of immunoadsorption columns could effectively deplete antibody titers. Glycosorb columns were more efficient than Adsopak columns. Graft survival was better with Glycosorb. Posttransplant infections were a major cause of mortality.
我们介绍了使用免疫吸附(IA)柱进行ABO血型不相容肾移植的经验。我们比较了两种市售柱的疗效。
这项单中心前瞻性研究在德里的陆军医院研究与转诊中心进行。对2014年1月至2018年2月期间所有连续的ABO血型不相容肾移植进行了分析。在30例接受移植的患者中,28例采用免疫吸附柱进行抗体清除。其中,14例在“Glycosorb组”,14例在“Adsopak组”。
Adsopak组的供体比Glycosorb组的供体年龄大(p<0.05)。两组大多数供体为配偶。抗体滴度的临界值为1:8。Adsopak组的中位滴度为128(范围为1:4至1:2048),而Glycosorb组为24(范围为1:8至1:128)。Glycosorb组所有患者的基线滴度≤1:128,而Adsopak组有13例患者的基线滴度≤1:512。使用Glycosorb®可使滴度降至零(50%,7/14),而使用Adsopak®则不能(P<0.01)。移植前,Glycosorb组大约需要4次治疗,而Adsopak组大约需要8次治疗(p<0.001)。Glycosorb组在移植物失败方面具有优势,因为在随访期间这些患者未发现排斥反应。Adsopak组有3例患者发生排斥反应(2例为混合性排斥反应,1例为抗体介导的排斥反应)。4例患者死于败血症(Glycosorb组3例,Adsopak组1例)。Glycosorb组的基线血清肌酐水平较低。
ABO血型不相容肾移植的结果令人满意,使用免疫吸附柱可有效降低抗体滴度。Glycosorb柱比Adsopak柱更有效。Glycosorb组的移植物存活率更高。移植后感染是主要的死亡原因。