Suppr超能文献

程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达在预测癌症患者接受抗 PD-1 或抗 PD-L1 治疗疗效中的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Value of PD-L1 Expression in Predicting the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 or Anti-PD-L1 Therapy in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2020 Dec 16;2020:6717912. doi: 10.1155/2020/6717912. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent trials have shown an overall survival (OS) benefit in 10-40% advanced cancer patients treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between PD-L1 expression and the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with cancer with recurrent or metastatic disease, compared with control treatments.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to Jan 2019 and pooled the treatment effects (hazard ratio or relative ratio) of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with different PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

Overall, twenty-four qualifying trials with over 14,860 subjects were eligible in this study. Compared with conventional agents, anti-PD/PD-L1 drugs significantly reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78), irrespective of the tumor type. Additionally, when PD-L1 expression ≥1% was defined as positive, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy correlated with prolonged overall survival in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (0.72, 0.61 to 0.86) and other cancer types (0.66, 0.57 to 0.76) patients with PD-L1 positive, rather than those with PD-L1 negative (hazard ratio for NSCLC and other cancer types: 0.84 and 0.87, respectively; all > 0.05). The subgroup analyses to experimental agents, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-L1 antibody clone, and type of IHC scoring method validated the robustness of these findings. However, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies can reduce the risk of death for patients with different cancer types, regardless of PD-L1 expression ( < 0.05 for all PD-L1 expression status).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in patient selection for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, but not for combination therapies.

摘要

目的

最近的临床试验表明,在接受程序性细胞死亡 1(PD-1)或程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂治疗的 10%-40%晚期癌症患者中,总体生存(OS)得到了改善。在此,我们旨在评估 PD-L1 表达与 PD-1 或 PD-L1 抑制剂在复发性或转移性疾病癌症患者中的治疗效果的关系,并与对照治疗进行比较。

方法

我们系统地检索了截至 2019 年 1 月的 Medline(PubMed)、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,并对不同 PD-L1 表达水平的患者中 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂的治疗效果(风险比或相对比值)进行了汇总。

结果

总体而言,本研究共纳入了 24 项符合条件的试验,涉及超过 14860 名患者。与常规药物相比,抗 PD-1/PD-L1 药物显著降低了死亡风险(风险比 0.72,95%CI 0.66 至 0.78),与肿瘤类型无关。此外,当 PD-L1 表达≥1%定义为阳性时,抗 PD-1/PD-L1 单药治疗与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(0.72,0.61 至 0.86)和其他癌症类型(0.66,0.57 至 0.76)患者的总生存时间延长相关,而与 PD-L1 阴性患者无关(NSCLC 和其他癌症类型的风险比分别为 0.84 和 0.87;均>0.05)。对实验药物、PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂、PD-L1 抗体克隆和 IHC 评分方法类型的亚组分析验证了这些发现的稳健性。然而,抗 PD-1/PD-L1 联合治疗可降低不同癌症类型患者的死亡风险,而与 PD-L1 表达无关(所有 PD-L1 表达状态均<0.05)。

结论

我们建议将 PD-L1 表达作为抗 PD-1/PD-L1 单药治疗患者选择的预测生物标志物,但不建议用于联合治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验