• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰某眼科科室微生物性角膜炎发病趋势的七年分析:一项单中心研究

Seven-Year Analysis of Microbial Keratitis Tendency at an Ophthalmology Department in Poland: A Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Ulfik Klaudia, Teper Sławomir, Dembski Michał, Nowińska Anna, Wróblewska-Czajka Ewa, Wylęgała Edward

机构信息

Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Chair and Department of Ophthalmology, Panewnicka 65, 40-760 Katowice, Poland.

District Railway Hospital, Panewnicka 65, 40-760 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 28;2020:8851570. doi: 10.1155/2020/8851570. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/8851570
PMID:33489345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7803137/
Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the frequency, drug susceptibility, and drug resistance of pathogens causing microbial keratitis (a corneal inflammation) in the Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice. Despite intensive treatment, severe inflammation causes irreversible blindness in ∼7% of cases and eye loss (evisceration or enucleation of the eyeball) in ∼1% of cases at our hospital. The choice of a targeted drug depends on the culture result and drug resistance of the microorganism. This was a retrospective observation study. Conjunctival swabs and corneal scrapes were collected between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019, in the tertiary reference center for keratitis. The collected data included the type of material received, culture result, and antimicrobial susceptibilities. Of the 2482 samples analyzed, 679 were positive and 1803 were negative. Of the total pathogens isolated, 69.9% were Gram-positive bacteria, 20.8% were Gram-negative bacteria, and 7.1% were fungi. A significant increase in the number of Gram-positive methicillin-resistant and a partial increase in the number of Gram-negative beta-lactams-resistant bacteria were observed. All fungal species were sensitive to amphotericin B, 82.81% were sensitive to voriconazole, and 56.25% were sensitive to fluconazole. Dual drug therapy (levofloxacin and tobramycin) was the first-line treatment. Drug susceptibility testing of the cultured microorganisms is necessary to initiate targeted treatment. Increased drug resistance was observed in this study. In the present study, most bacteria were sensitive to fluoroquinolones. therapy remains the recommended empirical treatment in microbial keratitis. According to our study, voriconazole remains a first-line antifungal drug, when a fungal infection is suspected.

摘要

本研究旨在分析卡托维兹西里西亚医科大学眼科临床科室中引起微生物性角膜炎(一种角膜炎症)的病原体的频率、药敏性和耐药性。尽管进行了强化治疗,但在我院,严重炎症仍会导致约7%的病例出现不可逆性失明,约1%的病例出现眼球摘除(眼球摘除或眼球剜除)。靶向药物的选择取决于微生物的培养结果和耐药性。这是一项回顾性观察研究。于2013年1月1日至2019年12月31日在角膜炎三级转诊中心收集结膜拭子和角膜刮片。收集的数据包括所接收材料的类型、培养结果和抗菌药敏性。在分析的2482份样本中,679份为阳性,1803份为阴性。在分离出的病原体总数中,69.9%为革兰氏阳性菌,20.8%为革兰氏阴性菌,7.1%为真菌。观察到耐甲氧西林革兰氏阳性菌数量显著增加,耐β-内酰胺革兰氏阴性菌数量部分增加。所有真菌种类对两性霉素B敏感,82.81%对伏立康唑敏感,56.25%对氟康唑敏感。双联药物治疗(左氧氟沙星和妥布霉素)是一线治疗方法。对培养的微生物进行药敏试验对于启动靶向治疗是必要的。本研究中观察到耐药性增加。在本研究中,大多数细菌对氟喹诺酮类敏感。在微生物性角膜炎中, 治疗仍然是推荐的经验性治疗方法。根据我们的研究,当怀疑有真菌感染时,伏立康唑仍然是一线抗真菌药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/05b0591a5c97/joph2020-8851570.015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/377617a0642f/joph2020-8851570.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/7159d21047bb/joph2020-8851570.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/470d27ebb8e6/joph2020-8851570.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/d8ea4fbb4d90/joph2020-8851570.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/84f240efeaf2/joph2020-8851570.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/0c4354b47e46/joph2020-8851570.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/7ead9e00ca01/joph2020-8851570.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/1849301b62fb/joph2020-8851570.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/3b72166a39ac/joph2020-8851570.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/566df155d4c9/joph2020-8851570.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/bda95544c99a/joph2020-8851570.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/83203ac5deda/joph2020-8851570.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/ad9881a4d530/joph2020-8851570.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/bb8ecf99663e/joph2020-8851570.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/05b0591a5c97/joph2020-8851570.015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/377617a0642f/joph2020-8851570.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/7159d21047bb/joph2020-8851570.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/470d27ebb8e6/joph2020-8851570.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/d8ea4fbb4d90/joph2020-8851570.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/84f240efeaf2/joph2020-8851570.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/0c4354b47e46/joph2020-8851570.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/7ead9e00ca01/joph2020-8851570.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/1849301b62fb/joph2020-8851570.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/3b72166a39ac/joph2020-8851570.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/566df155d4c9/joph2020-8851570.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/bda95544c99a/joph2020-8851570.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/83203ac5deda/joph2020-8851570.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/ad9881a4d530/joph2020-8851570.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/bb8ecf99663e/joph2020-8851570.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86da/7803137/05b0591a5c97/joph2020-8851570.015.jpg

相似文献

1
Seven-Year Analysis of Microbial Keratitis Tendency at an Ophthalmology Department in Poland: A Single-Center Study.波兰某眼科科室微生物性角膜炎发病趋势的七年分析:一项单中心研究
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 28;2020:8851570. doi: 10.1155/2020/8851570. eCollection 2020.
2
[Analysis of distribution and drug resistance of pathogens from the wounds of 1 310 thermal burn patients].[1310例热烧伤患者创面病原菌分布及耐药性分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 20;34(11):802-808. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.016.
3
[Etiological analysis of infectious keratitis in children from 2007 to 2016].[2007年至2016年儿童感染性角膜炎的病因分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 11;58(6):433-440. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210809-00372.
4
[Analysis of the pathogenic characteristics of 162 severely burned patients with bloodstream infection].162例严重烧伤合并血流感染患者的致病特征分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 20;32(9):529-35. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.09.004.
5
[Analysis of distribution and drug resistance of pathogens isolated from 159 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection in burn intensive care unit].[烧伤重症监护病房159例导管相关血流感染患者病原菌分布及耐药性分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 20;36(1):24-31. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.01.005.
6
Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in south Florida and emerging resistance to fluoroquinolones.南佛罗里达州细菌性角膜炎的变化趋势以及对氟喹诺酮类药物新出现的耐药性。
Ophthalmology. 2000 Aug;107(8):1497-502. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00179-2.
7
[Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from keratitis and intraocular infections at Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Colombia].[从哥伦比亚弗洛里达布兰卡市桑坦德眼科基金会(FOSCAL)的角膜炎和眼内感染中分离出的细菌的抗生素敏感性模式]
Biomedica. 2014 Apr;34 Suppl 1:23-33. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572014000500004.
8
Keratitis antimicrobial resistance surveillance program, Sydney, Australia: 2016 Annual Report.澳大利亚悉尼的角膜炎抗菌药物耐药性监测计划:2016 年度报告。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;47(1):20-25. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13364. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
9
Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistance among methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates from keratitis and conjunctivitis.来自角膜炎和结膜炎的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星的耐药性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;137(3):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.026.
10
Seasonal, geographic, and antimicrobial resistance patterns in microbial keratitis: 4-year experience in eastern Pennsylvania.微生物性角膜炎的季节性、地理分布及抗菌药物耐药模式:宾夕法尼亚州东部的4年经验
Cornea. 2015 Mar;34(3):296-302. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000352.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between in vitro susceptibility and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis.真菌性角膜炎的体外药敏与临床结局之间的关联。
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12348-024-00418-w.
2
A comparison of antimicrobial regimen outcomes and antibiogram development in microbial keratitis: a prospective cohort study in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大微生物角膜炎的抗生素方案结果和药敏谱发展比较:前瞻性队列研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1865-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06362-0. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Evaluation of antifungal susceptibility and clinical characteristics in fungal keratitis in a tertiary care center in North India.

本文引用的文献

1
Case Report: Corneal Coinfection with Fungus and : Report of Two Patients and Literature Review.病例报告:真菌和 的角膜合并感染:两例患者报告及文献复习。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Sep;99(3):805-808. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0158. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Update on the Management of Infectious Keratitis.感染性角膜炎的治疗进展
Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1678-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Twelve-year analysis of microbial keratitis trends at a UK tertiary hospital.英国一家三级医院微生物性角膜炎趋势的十二年分析
评估印度北部一家三级护理中心真菌性角膜炎的抗真菌药敏性和临床特征。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4270-4283. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_855_22.
Eye (Lond). 2017 Aug;31(8):1229-1236. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.55. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Evaluation of the in vitro ocular toxicity of the fortified antibiotic eye drops prepared at the Hospital Pharmacy Departments.对医院药房配制的强化抗生素眼药水的体外眼毒性评估。
Farm Hosp. 2016 Sep 1;40(5):352-70. doi: 10.7399/fh.2016.40.5.10416.
5
Update on Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.棘阿米巴角膜炎的最新进展:诊断、治疗及预后
Cornea. 2016 May;35(5):713-20. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000804.
6
Clinical Characteristics and Bacteriological Profile of Moraxella Keratitis.莫拉克斯氏菌角膜炎的临床特征及细菌学概况
Cornea. 2015 Sep;34(9):1105-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000470.
7
Association between in vitro susceptibility to natamycin and voriconazole and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis.纳他霉素和伏立康唑的体外药敏与真菌性角膜炎临床结局之间的关联
Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1495-500.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
Clinical presentation and morbidity of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis: a retrospective study.接触镜相关微生物角膜炎的临床表现和发病情况:一项回顾性研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;252(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2514-1. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
9
Microbial analyses of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis.隐形眼镜相关性微生物性角膜炎的微生物分析
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jan;91(1):47-53. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000082.
10
Diversity of microbial species implicated in keratitis: a review.与角膜炎相关的微生物物种多样性:综述
Open Ophthalmol J. 2012;6:110-24. doi: 10.2174/1874364101206010110. Epub 2012 Nov 30.