Suppr超能文献

药品标签:印度处方药监管要求合规性研究

Drug labeling: The study of compliance of regulatory requirements for prescription drugs in India.

作者信息

Shah Suchi, Singh Anil

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, B.J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Department of Pharmacology, PDU Government Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):164-167. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_195_18. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to check the compliance of regulatory requirements of drug labeling in India according to guidelines given under the Drug and Cosmetic Rules (D & CRs) 1945, Section 96, 97; drug samples were collected from government drug supply and private practitioners (PPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 drugs were selected randomly from schedule H. They were divided into two groups, each containing 50 drugs: (1) drug samples from drug store of a government hospital, manufactured for Gujarat government and (2) drug samples from PPs which are given to them by pharmaceutical companies. Each drug label was checked according to the criteria given under the D & CRs 1945, Section 96, 97. Data entry was done in Microsoft Excel 2013 and analysis was done.

RESULTS

Major deficiencies were seen in criteria of pharmacopeia (absent in 8% samples from government supply [GS] and 64% in samples from PPs), schedule (absent in 18% GS samples and 32% in PP samples), warning of schedule (absent in 6% GS samples and 4% in PP samples), Rx (absent in 22% GS samples and 28% in PP samples), red line (absent in 14% GS samples), and drug warning (absent in 84% GS samples and 72% in PP samples).

CONCLUSION

As the study results show lacunae in the contents of the labeling of prescribed drugs in samples from both the groups, there should be strict enforcement of D & CR 1945 and monitoring of drug labels for better and safer use of medicines.

摘要

目的

根据1945年《药品和化妆品规则》(D&CRs)第96、97条规定的指南,检查印度药品标签的监管要求合规情况;从政府药品供应机构和私人执业医生(PPs)处收集药品样本。

材料与方法

从H表中随机选取100种药品。将它们分为两组,每组50种药品:(1)来自一家政府医院药房、为古吉拉特邦政府生产的药品样本;(2)私人执业医生从制药公司获得的药品样本。根据1945年《药品和化妆品规则》第96、97条规定的标准检查每种药品标签。数据录入Microsoft Excel 2013并进行分析。

结果

在药典标准方面存在主要缺陷(政府供应[GS]样本中8%缺失,私人执业医生样本中64%缺失)、附表(GS样本中18%缺失,私人执业医生样本中32%缺失)、附表警示(GS样本中6%缺失,私人执业医生样本中4%缺失)、Rx(GS样本中22%缺失,私人执业医生样本中28%缺失)、红线(GS样本中14%缺失)以及药品警示(GS样本中84%缺失,私人执业医生样本中72%缺失)。

结论

由于研究结果显示两组样本中处方药标签内容存在缺陷,应严格执行1945年《药品和化妆品规则》并对药品标签进行监管,以实现药品更安全有效的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba3b/7819375/35ae33cbf387/PCR-11-164-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验